Kiffmeister’s #Fintech Daily Digest (20260925)

HKMA to Introduce Wholesale CBDC as Project EnsembleTX Settlement Asset (HKMA)

The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) is planning to make a wholesale central bank digital currency (CBDC) available for interbank settlement of tokenized deposits as part of Project EnsembleTX, enabling 24/7 payments by around the end of 2026, and will continue to explore more use cases for tokenized deposits. The pilot, launched in November 2025, initially used the HKD real-time gross settlement (RTGS) system to settle the transactions. [HKMA]

ECB Assessing Feasibility of Interlinking TIPS with Brazil’s Pix (ECB)

The European Central Bank (ECB) will assess the feasibility of linking the Eurosystem’s TARGET Instant Payment Settlement (TIPS) platform to Central Bank of Brazil’s Pix instant-payment system. A link could make payments between the euro area and Brazil faster and cheaper, extending the Eurosystem’s broader effort to connect TIPS with foreign instant-payment systems. However, technical, operational, legal and business arrangements remain to be evaluated. [ECB]

US FRB Proposes Rules for FRB-Regulated Stablecoin Issuers (FRB)

The U.S. Federal Reserve Board (FRB) proposed two rules to implement the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act for FRB-supervised payment stablecoin issuers: one governing issuance, reserves and supervision, and another governing applications by supervised banks. The first would require full backing with eligible liquid assets, including short-term Treasury bills, and set capital and risk-management standards; it would also regulate reserve-asset safekeeping and clarify permissible bank activities. The second would require applicants to provide a business plan and financial information and establish procedures for appeals and final decisions. Their final terms remain subject to comment, due 60 days after Federal Register publication. [FRB]

BTW if you want to see a complete database of my DFC-related posts going back years, including many that didn’t make the Daily Digest cut, click here.

FYI I produce a monthly digest of digital fiat currency (DFC) developments exclusively for the official sector (e.g., central banks, ministries of finance and international financial institution (e.g., the BIS, IMF, OECD, World Bank)) plus academics and firms that are active in the DFC space (commercial banks, technology providers, consultants, etc.). (DFCs include central bank digital currency (CBDC), stablecoins and tokenized deposits.) It goes out via email on the first business day of every month, and if you’re interested in being on the mailing list, please email me at john@kiffmeister.com.

Kiffmeister’s #Fintech Daily Digest (20260920)

Saudi Arabia Quits mBridge Cross-Border Currency Platform (FT)

The Financial Times (FT) reported that the Saudi Arabian Monetary Authority (SAMA) withdrew from the blockchain-based mBridge cross-border payments platform on May 13, 2025. SAMA joined the project as an observing member in 2023, and became an active participant in 2024, joining China, Hong Kong, Thailand, the United Arab Emirates and the Bank for International Settlements (BIS). The BIS “graduated out” of the project in October 2024. SAMA said in a statement provided to the FT that “as planned, SAMA successfully completed its mBridge [proof of concept (PoC)] on 13 May 2025 [and] following the completion of the PoC, SAMA is no longer a participating member of mBridge.” [FT]

BTW if you want to see a complete database of my DFC-related posts going back years, including many that didn’t make the Daily Digest cut, click here.

FYI I produce a monthly digest of digital fiat currency (DFC) developments exclusively for the official sector (e.g., central banks, ministries of finance and international financial institution (e.g., the BIS, IMF, OECD, World Bank)) plus academics and firms that are active in the DFC space (commercial banks, technology providers, consultants, etc.). (DFCs include central bank digital currency (CBDC), stablecoins and tokenized deposits.) It goes out via email on the first business day of every month, and if you’re interested in being on the mailing list, please email me at john@kiffmeister.com.

Kiffmeister’s #Fintech Daily Digest (20260917)

U.S. SEC Issues Innovation Exemption to Facilitate the Trading of Tokenized NMS Stock (SEC)

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) granted temporary exemptive relief to tokenized securities venues (TSVs) from the definition of “exchange” in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to trade tokenized National Market System (NMS) stock using innovative permissioned automated market makers and liquidity pools. The relief creates a five-year, bounded pathway for on-chain secondary trading and proprietary-capital liquidity provision without immediate exchange or dealer registration. It is conditioned on limits on symbols and volume, equivalent shareholder rights, issuer notice for third-party tokenization, auditable public smart contracts, synchronized trading halts, and transparency. The SEC will solicit comment before deciding whether durable rulemaking is warranted. Unresolved issues include appropriate scale, market-structure safeguards, issuer control, and the regulatory treatment of liquidity providers. [SEC]

Money and Power: Lessons from History for Stablecoins and US Dollar Dominance (BOE)

External member of the Bank of England (BOE) Financial Policy Committee Carolyn Wilkins concludes that while private digital currencies could theoretically scale, their stability remains highly conditional on credible convertibility, uniform regulation, and robust crisis-management frameworks. Probing the implications of expanding U.S. dollar stablecoins, she notes potential benefits for dollar settlement but questions their resilience during panics, warning that ostensibly liquid reserve assets may suffer severe liquidity deficits under systemic stress. Furthermore, Wilkins identifies regulatory heterogeneity across jurisdictions as a critical vulnerability complicating cross-border enforcement. She ultimately cautions against assuming technology guarantees dominance, asserting that enduring international monetary power depends strictly on fundamental fiscal capacity, institutional credibility, and the rule of law rather than mere network effects. [BOE]

And some catching up to something I missed in 2025:

NBKR Sets Out Digital Som Project Sequencing (NBKR)

[March 10, 2025] The National Bank of the Kyrgyz Republic (NBKR) laid out its plans to issue a blockchain-based Digital Som central bank digital currency (CBDC) to enhance financial inclusion, payment security, and digital economy infrastructure. Following the the IMF’s “5P” methodology, the project will progress sequentially from initial proof-of-concept functional testing to limited-user prototyping, followed by a live pilot before fully launch (“production”). Over the 2027–2030 horizon, the central bank aims to incorporate smart contracts for programmable payments, establish cross-border interoperability with foreign platforms, and optimize throughput and cyber resilience, supported in parallel by a dedicated regulatory framework governing platform operators and participant connectivity. [NBKR]

BTW if you want to see a complete database of my DFC-related posts going back years, including many that didn’t make the Daily Digest cut, click here.

FYI I produce a monthly digest of digital fiat currency (DFC) developments exclusively for the official sector (e.g., central banks, ministries of finance and international financial institution (e.g., the BIS, IMF, OECD, World Bank)) plus academics and firms that are active in the DFC space (commercial banks, technology providers, consultants, etc.). (DFCs include central bank digital currency (CBDC), stablecoins and tokenized deposits.) It goes out via email on the first business day of every month, and if you’re interested in being on the mailing list, please email me at john@kiffmeister.com.

Kiffmeister’s #Fintech Daily Digest (20260913)

Safe Settlement Assets for Wholesale Tokenized Financial Markets (LinkedIn)

Drawing on remarks delivered at the recent Currency Research Central Bank Payments Conference, Ashley Lannquist (Glenbrook Partners) set out a decision framework for policymakers weighing which form of settlement asset should support safe large-scale tokenized financial markets — settled on distributed ledger technology (DLT). (“Large-scale” denotes markets that would ordinarily settle on a systemically important financial market infrastructure such as a central securities depository or securities settlement system.) Once such activity migrates onto DLT, safety concerns compel a choice governed by whether the asset (1) should be central bank money and (2) should be “on-chain.” The resulting matrix maps to wholesale central bank digital currency (CBDC) (yes/yes), real-time gross settlement (RTGS) synchronization (yes/no), regulated asset-backed stablecoins, tokenized e-money, or tokenized bank deposits (no/yes), and bank deposits (no/no). The framework is not prescriptive, being conditional on country context and acknowledging unresolved empirical questions about benefits and risks. [LinkedIn]

Fast Payment Systems and the Cost of Remittances (Banca d’Italia)

A Banca d’Italia paper by Brandi, Di Iorio, and Nobili concludes that adopting domestic fast payment systems (FPS) reduces inbound remittance costs by roughly 0.25 percentage points. It finds this is primarily achieved by compressing foreign exchange margins via increased non-bank competition. However, the authors temper these findings by highlighting significant regional heterogeneity, noting zero statistically significant cost reductions in Latin America and Europe. Furthermore, they question causality, acknowledging that FPS adoption often coincides with broader regulatory modernization. To defend their thesis, the authors employ an instrumental variable approach using market provider density to isolate whether the FPS itself is the true catalyst for the observed competition and subsequent cost compression. [Banca d’Italia]

BTW if you want to see a complete database of my DFC-related posts going back years, including many that didn’t make the Daily Digest cut, click here.

FYI I produce a monthly digest of digital fiat currency (DFC) developments exclusively for the official sector (e.g., central banks, ministries of finance and international financial institution (e.g., the BIS, IMF, OECD, World Bank)) plus academics and firms that are active in the DFC space (commercial banks, technology providers, consultants, etc.). (DFCs include central bank digital currency (CBDC), stablecoins and tokenized deposits.) It goes out via email on the first business day of every month, and if you’re interested in being on the mailing list, please email me at john@kiffmeister.com.

Kiffmeister’s #Fintech Daily Digest (20260910)

The Stablecoin Transfer Volume Number in Most Board Packs is Misleading (AI-Mabrook)

In its third quarter 2026 Digital Assets Executive Industry Update Al-Mabrook Financial questions the reliability of headline stablecoin transfer volume metrics, challenging the oft-cited $62 trillion transfer volume for 2025 as a true measure of adoption. The data suggests it is not, filtering gross volume down to just $350–$550 billion in genuine real-economy payments. Business-to-business transactions ($150 to $230 billion) dominate this legitimate flow because traditional rails remain inefficient, followed by consumer-to-consumer remittances and consumer-to-business payments ($90 to $130 billion each). Business-to-consumer flow, largely payroll and marketplace payouts, accounts for the remainder. [AI-Mabrook]

Stablecoin Multi-Country Issuance and Dollar-Run Risks in Europe (CEPR)

A Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) paper by Martino, Monnet, and Perotti critically examines the systemic risks posed by multi-country issuance of USD-denominated stablecoins. The authors argue that because the European Union (EU) Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulations guarantees unconditional, par-value redemptions—unlike proposed U.S. regulations that permit fees and gates—technologically fungible tokens create dangerous avenues for cross-border redemption arbitrage. In times of stress, this regulatory asymmetry incentivizes rational holders to offload dollar-run risks entirely onto EU-based issuers. Conceding that structural bans on multi-country issuance are politically unlikely, the authors propose a pragmatic mitigation strategy to achieve “functional redemption equivalence.” They advocate mandating automatic, smart-contract-embedded contingent measures, specifically sequencing redemption fees ahead of hard gates, to deter self-fulfilling runs. Furthermore, the paper recommends granting the European Central Bank powers to suspend non-euro stablecoin redemptions during severe crises, aiming to safeguard EU monetary sovereignty against unhedgeable USD stablecoin market contagion. [CEPR]

Privacy in Wholesale Cross-Border Payments: Assessing Project Agorá (SUERF)

A Société Universitaire Européenne de Recherches Financières (SUERF) paper by Jan Camenisch and the Swiss National Bank’s Thomas Moser evaluates the privacy architecture of the Bank for International Settlements Project Agorá, a distributed ledger initiative for wholesale cross-border payments, against five design objectives. The authors note that Agorá utilizes the Paladin framework to achieve selective disclosure, regulatory access, and multijurisdictional configurability with low computational overhead. However, the assessment highlights significant architectural trade-offs. By relying on issuer-delegated verification rather than trustless systems, the design concentrates information and trust within issuing entities. Additionally, keeping private state off-ledger introduces resilience challenges, and the network remains vulnerable to metadata leakage. Ultimately, the paper concludes that while Agorá is operationally pragmatic, future phases must address off-chain state management and metadata vulnerabilities. [SUERF]

BTW if you want to see a complete database of my DFC-related posts going back years, including many that didn’t make the Daily Digest cut, click here.

FYI I produce a monthly digest of digital fiat currency (DFC) developments exclusively for the official sector (e.g., central banks, ministries of finance and international financial institution (e.g., the BIS, IMF, OECD, World Bank)) plus academics and firms that are active in the DFC space (commercial banks, technology providers, consultants, etc.). (DFCs include central bank digital currency (CBDC), stablecoins and tokenized deposits.) It goes out via email on the first business day of every month, and if you’re interested in being on the mailing list, please email me at john@kiffmeister.com.

Kiffmeister’s #Fintech Daily Digest (20260903)

Digital Currency in the Australian Context: An Update (RBA)

The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) and the Australian Government Treasury published reports that concluded that Australia’s retail payment system is serving households and businesses well, and that there is no clear public interest case for a retail central bank digital currency (CBDC). This is consistent with the conclusions of the 2024 “Central Bank Digital Currency and the Future of Digital Money in Australia” RBA and Treasury joint paper. The new assessment drew on a public consultation conducted by Verian Group, which asked Australians about their payment needs and views on a potential retail CBDC. Going forward, the RBA will continue monitoring developments in retail payments, cash accessibility, tokenized money, consumer payment preferences and digital finance domestically and internationally, to ensure it remains well placed to reassess the case for a retail CBDC should circumstances (and the policy case) change in the future. In the meantime, the RBA remains committed to progressing an ambitious range of initiatives in wholesale markets and money, including a coordinated work program on wholesale tokenized finance. [RBA]

The Role of RITS in Supporting Settlement in a Tokenized Ecosystem (RBA)

The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) launched a consultation on the roles of the Reserve Bank Information and Transfer System (RITS) (the RBA’s real-time gross settlement (RTGS) platform) and Fast Settlement System (FSS) (the RBA’s fast payment platform) in supporting settlement in a tokenized ecosystem. As highlighted in the May 2026 Project Acacia final report, tokenization has the potential to enhance the efficiency, functionality and resilience of Australia’s wholesale financial markets. The consultation seeks views on how the RBA’s settlement services could support the development and growth of tokenized asset markets and tokenized private money in Australia, while continuing to promote safety, efficiency and financial stability. The consultation is one of several initiatives identified in Project Acacia as forming the basis of a future program of work aimed at ensuring Australia’s money, payments and settlement arrangements remain fit for the future. The RBA is also seeking views on key design considerations for tokenized central bank reserves. [RBA]

Harneys and droppRWA Plan First Blockchain-Recorded Catastrophe Bond Issue (Coindesk)

Harneys, a global offshore law firm originally established in the British Virgin Islands, and droppRWA, a Bermuda-based tokenization platform, reportedly plan to issue tokenized catastrophe (CAT) bonds by 2027, transitioning legal ownership directly onto a blockchain. This could compress reconciliation from days to seconds and reduce minimum investments from $250,000 to $5,000 via beneficial interest vehicles. The project is still pending applicable regulatory requirements and approvals. Any platform administrator role would be subject to licensing under Bermuda’s Digital Asset Business Act 2018. [Coindesk]

BTW if you want to see a complete database of my DFC-related posts going back years, including many that didn’t make the Daily Digest cut, click here.

FYI I produce a monthly digest of digital fiat currency (DFC) developments exclusively for the official sector (e.g., central banks, ministries of finance and international financial institution (e.g., the BIS, IMF, OECD, World Bank)) plus academics and firms that are active in the DFC space (commercial banks, technology providers, consultants, etc.). (DFCs include central bank digital currency (CBDC), stablecoins and tokenized deposits.) It goes out via email on the first business day of every month, and if you’re interested in being on the mailing list, please email me at john@kiffmeister.com.

Kiffmeister’s #Fintech Daily Digest (20260828)

Russia’s Digital Ruble Goes Live on September 1 (Bank of Russia)

The large-scale rollout of the digital ruble will begin on September 1, 2026, when customers of the largest Russian banks may use the retail central bank digital currency (CBDC) through a single wallet accessible in participating banks’ mobile applications. The Bank of Russia will initially require major banks and merchants with annual revenues exceeding ₽120 million to support the digital ruble, with broader bank and merchant obligations phased in through September 2028. Firms with annual revenues below ₽5 million are exempt from acceptance requirements. The arrangement avoids interbank transfers of digital-ruble balances: users can fund the wallet from conventional bank accounts up to ₽300,000 rubles per month, make unrestricted person-to-person transfers, and pay merchants without fees. A universal merchant QR code will present digital-ruble payment alongside the Faster Payments System and other available methods. [Bank of Russia]

Regulating Stablecoin Issuance: Permissible Entities and Activities (BIS)

The BIS published a paper by Currat, Ehrentraud and Ocampo that provides a comparative analysis of the regulatory frameworks for stablecoin issuers across the European Union, Hong Kong, Singapore, the United Kingdom and the United States. It finds that approaches differ significantly, particularly in terms of the types of entities allowed to issue them and the scope of activities permitted beyond core issuance. Stablecoin frameworks generally limit issuers to a core set of functions such as issuance, redemption and reserve management, but they differ in how far issuers may stray from them. Frameworks that allow banks to issue under existing prudential regimes tend to permit a broader range of activities, as their regulatory framework already mitigates associated risks. In constrast, bespoke regimes for stablecoin issuers impose stricter limits. These activity restrictions apply to the issuing entity rather than the group. For banks, consolidated supervision already constrains the relocation of activities to affiliates; for non-banks, no equivalent group-wide framework applies, and restrictions can be circumvented with corporate structuring. [BIS]

First Fully Onchain Repo Transaction Completed Using a Sovereign Digital Bond (Businesswire)

Virtu Financial, M1X Global, and Tradeweb completed the first fully onchain repo transaction using a sovereign digital bond, USDM1, as collateral on the Canton Network. USDM1, natively issued by the Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI) under New York law as a Brady-bond-style instrument backed 1:1 by short-dated US Treasuries, functioned as collateral with atomic settlement across securities, cash, and repurchase legs, completing a full cycle in under 10 minutes. Unlike prior onchain repo demonstrations using digital cash or off-chain collateral, this combined natively issued sovereign collateral with full onchain settlement. The structure claims favorable Basel 3.1 risk-weighting versus stablecoins or tokenized funds, and supports ISDA/GMRA netting. However, USDM1 is being offered and sold solely outside the United States in reliance on Regulation S under the U.S. Securities Act. [Businesswire]

Marshall Islands MEC Partnering With Lomalo to Expand Electricity Payment Options (MEC)

The Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI) Marshalls Energy Company (MEC) will enable prepaid electricity (“Cash Power”) purchases through Lomalo’s mobile wallet from August, supplementing existing online purchases through MEC’s website. Verified users link a meter number, buy credit in the app, and receive a token for manual entry into the existing meter. Registered meters receive a $10 introductory credit. The arrangement embeds an essential-utility payment use case in Lomalo, a mobile wallet operated with the Ministry of Finance, Banking and Postal Services. Lomalo wallet-to-wallet transfers are made via blockchain-based interest-paying USDM1 sovereign digital bonds pegged to the U.S. dollar and backed by equivalent values of short-term U.S. Treasury Bills. Lomalo’s and USDM1’s flagship use case is distributing ENRA, the RMI’s universal basic income (UBI) program. [MEC]

BTW if you want to see a complete database of my DFC-related posts going back years, including many that didn’t make the Daily Digest cut, click here.

FYI I produce a monthly digest of digital fiat currency (DFC) developments exclusively for the official sector (e.g., central banks, ministries of finance and international financial institution (e.g., the BIS, IMF, OECD, World Bank)) plus academics and firms that are active in the DFC space (commercial banks, technology providers, consultants, etc.). (DFCs include central bank digital currency (CBDC), stablecoins and tokenized deposits.) It goes out via email on the first business day of every month, and if you’re interested in being on the mailing list, please email me at john@kiffmeister.com.

Kiffmeister’s #Fintech Daily Digest (20260827)

Meeting the Challenge of Correspondent Bank Relationship Withdrawals in fully Dollarized Microstates (SSRN)

I have just completed a first draft of a paper that examines emerging digital financial infrastructure and instruments as potential complements to the standard prescriptions aimed at mitigating the domestic financial system risks risks of correspondent banking relationship (CBR) withdrawal in officially dollarized microstates. Such microstates surrender the monetary autonomy of a central bank in exchange for the stability of a foreign currency, and in doing so make their domestic financial systems dependent on CBRs that global banks are increasingly unwilling to maintain. The existing IMF and World Bank literature treats CBR withdrawal primarily as a cross-border payments problem, and its prescriptions are addressed to that dimension. This paper assesses the capacity of emerging digital financial infrastructure and instruments to sustain domestic financial system functionality independent of a CBR, and the extent to which they may allow governments to recapture economic benefits analogous in some respects to the seigniorage that dollarization forgoes. Comments please! [SSRN]

Tokenized Deposits Could Affect Bank Liquidity, Maturity Transformation (Dallas Fed)

The U.S. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (Dallas Fed) published an article that claims that widespread tokenized-deposit adoption could erode banks’ maturity-transformation capacity and increase liquidity needs, in the context of real-time payments, stablecoin competition, and emerging bank-led on-chain deposit models. By making deposits more transferable and rate-sensitive, tokenization could shorten their expected life and raise deposit betas, reducing the effective duration that supports longer-term lending. The authors estimate that deposits support roughly 80% of aggregate bank duration exposure; a 10% reduction in deposit life or increase in rate sensitivity could materially reduce capacity or require more term funding, raising credit costs. Faster outflows could also increase demand for reserves and Treasuries. [Dallas Fed]

BTW if you want to see a complete database of my DFC-related posts going back years, including many that didn’t make the Daily Digest cut, click here.

FYI I produce a monthly digest of digital fiat currency (DFC) developments exclusively for the official sector (e.g., central banks, ministries of finance and international financial institution (e.g., the BIS, IMF, OECD, World Bank)) plus academics and firms that are active in the DFC space (commercial banks, technology providers, consultants, etc.). (DFCs include central bank digital currency (CBDC), stablecoins and tokenized deposits.) It goes out via email on the first business day of every month, and if you’re interested in being on the mailing list, please email me at john@kiffmeister.com.

Kiffmeister’s #Fintech Daily Digest (20260822)

Kiffmeister’s #DFC Weekly Digest

FYI although I call this a *daily* digest my intent is to only post when there’s something substantive to post, and it has been a very quiet week! Maybe it’s just the summer doldrums? However, if you’re interested in digital fiat currency (DFC) news that doesn’t make the “Daily” cut, every Saturday I post a weekly digest here: Kiffmeister’s #DFC Weekly Digest.

Meanwhile, here is some news that did make the Daily Digest cut:

Proposed Rules on Who Can Legally Sell Stablecoins in United States (U.S. Treasury)

The U.S. Treasury has proposed rules implementing Section 3 of the GENIUS Act that define when a payment stablecoin is “issued,” “offered,” or “sold” in the United States, thereby determining licensing and market-access obligations. Issuance by an unlicensed person is generally prohibited from January 18, 2027; foreign issuers must be capable of complying with U.S. lawful orders and reciprocal jurisdictional arrangements; and, from July 18, 2028, U.S.-facing digital-asset service providers generally may offer only stablecoins issued by licensed issuers. The proposal operationalizes the Act’s territorial and intermediary-facing boundaries, making its definitions consequential for issuer structuring, offshore access, platform compliance, and the effective scope of federal/state stablecoin licensing. [U.S. Treasury]

How to Regulate Stablecoins -Exploring the Debatable Land between Securities and Payment Regulation (SSRN)

Simon Gleeson proposes that U.K. stablecoin regulation should treat fiat-backed stablecoins primarily as payment instruments, not securities, because applying investment-market rules to their circulation is functionally incompatible with their intended money-like use. He locates the problem in a regulatory boundary: securities law restricts retail acquisition and intermediation, whereas payments regulation principally governs the resilience, conduct and competition of core payment providers. Simon argues that legal classification should turn on economic function and actual use, not token form or origin. The central unresolved issues are whether stablecoin custody can accommodate deposit-like title transfer, how broadly “arranging” captures software and infrastructure providers, and how financial-promotion, advice and arranging rules overlap—creating material uncertainty for UK-facing firms. [SSRN]
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=7294080

BTW if you want to see a complete database of my DFC-related posts going back years, including many that didn’t make the Daily Digest cut, click here.

FYI I produce a monthly digest of digital fiat currency (DFC) developments exclusively for the official sector (e.g., central banks, ministries of finance and international financial institution (e.g., the BIS, IMF, OECD, World Bank)) plus academics and firms that are active in the DFC space (commercial banks, technology providers, consultants, etc.). (DFCs include central bank digital currency (CBDC), stablecoins and tokenized deposits.) It goes out via email on the first business day of every month, and if you’re interested in being on the mailing list, please email me at john@kiffmeister.com.

Kiffmeister’s #Fintech Daily Digest (20260815)

KPMG U.S. Unqualified Audit Opinion on Tether’s 2025 Financial Statements (Tether)

Tether reported that KPMG U.S. issued an unqualified opinion on Tether International’s 2025 U.S. GAAP financial statements, marking a shift from periodic reserve attestations to a full financial-statement audit. The audit tested assets, token-related liabilities, transactions, systems, ownership evidence, valuations and counterparties. Tether says it included physical inspection of its gold bars and showed reserves exceeding liabilities by $6.814 billion at year-end. However, Tether did not release the statements themselves, so there is still much that is not known, such as accounting policies, reserve composition, and counterparty exposures. [Tether]

Use of Cash by Companies in the Euro Area in 2026 (ECB)

According to the latest European Central Bank (ECB) survey of 8,205 euro area consumer-facing merchants, cash acceptance has stabilized rather than continued its post-pandemic decline. 92% of firms with physical points of sale accepted cash in 2026, up from 90% in 2024, while 92% of current acceptors expect to continue over five years. Mobile-payment acceptance increased to 68% from 36% in 2024, alongside broadly unchanged card acceptance (88%). 25% of firms have taken measures to steer customers toward digital payments, and 48% with self-checkout terminals accept no cash at those terminals. Cash-access frictions—especially deposit/withdrawal inconvenience—are increasingly cited by non-acceptors, making cash infrastructure and cash-capable automation the principal unresolved constraints. [ECB]

Monetary Assurance, Payment Authority and the Payment Trust Architecture Design Space (Crunchfish)

Crunchfish published a paper arguing that every payment rests on two separable assurances—monetary assurance (sufficient value exists) and payment authority (the transaction is validly authorized)—whose representations can evolve independently, defining a “payment trust architecture design space”. It maps two dimensions: monetary assurance as “trusted assertion” (system-dependent) versus “trusted object” (independently verifiable), and payment authority as “trusted session” (session-bound) versus “trusted intent” (portable). Their four combinations yield distinct capabilities, generalized through the concept of “portable trust”. Crunchfish’s “governed offline” model is offered as the first practical instance. It gives monetary assurance and payment authority separate lifecycles: the former established in advance through reservation, the latter created locally as a “trusted intent” at payment. The broader principle is proposed as relevant to delegated and programmable payments, AI-agent transactions, and tokenized markets. [Crunchfish]

BTW if you want to see a complete database of my DFC-related posts going back years, including many that didn’t make the Daily Digest cut, click here.

FYI I produce a monthly digest of digital fiat currency (DFC) developments exclusively for the official sector (e.g., central banks, ministries of finance and international financial institution (e.g., the BIS, IMF, OECD, World Bank)) plus academics and firms that are active in the DFC space (commercial banks, technology providers, consultants, etc.). (DFCs include central bank digital currency (CBDC), stablecoins and tokenized deposits.) It goes out via email on the first business day of every month, and if you’re interested in being on the mailing list, please email me at john@kiffmeister.com.