Kiffmeister’s #Fintech Daily Digest (20260701)

July 1, 2026July 1, 2026 ~ kiffmeister ~ Leave a comment

Project Agila: Results, Technical Findings and Policy Implications (BSP)

Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) published a paper that concludes a wholesale central bank digital currency (WCBDC) on Hyperledger Fabric is technically feasible for 24/7 interbank settlement and could serve as a conditional back-up to PhilPaSS Plus, subject to major design, risk, and legal work. The two-phase Project Agila sandbox showed Oracle’s distributed ledger technology (DLT) platform can support full WCBDC lifecycle operations, programmable payments and high volumes, but with clear constraints around transaction finality, access controls, cybersecurity, and scalability at larger loads. The report frames WCBDC as reserves-on-ledger and potential high-quality liquid asset, analyzes implications under the National Payment Systems Act and BSP Charter, and identifies systemically important payment system treatment, access, holding limits, and charter changes as key policy questions. It recommends focusing next on tokenized securities settlement and institutional cross-border use cases while hardening governance, IT risk, and integration with existing financial market infrastructures (FMIs). [BSP]

Stablecoins and Anonymous Money (BIS)

Gita Gopinath argues that global stablecoin usage is structurally evolving toward maximum pseudonymity, in tension with decades of policy that pushed traditional money toward transparency. Empirically, most United States dollar‑pegged stablecoins (Tether and USD Coin) are held in self‑custody wallets and increasingly transferred wallet‑to‑wallet, with regulated exchanges and issuers involved in a shrinking share of flows, even on the most identifiable chains. This pattern undermines tax collection, financial‑crime controls, capital controls, and sanctions that depend on residence and identity information, while exploiting lighter compliance burdens relative to banks. Existing United States and European frameworks focus on issuers and centralized exchanges, leaving self‑custody and offshore activity largely outside ex ante monitoring, raising unresolved questions on how far regulation should extend into wallet‑level and cross‑border infrastructure. [BIS]

BTW if you want to see a complete database of my DFC-related posts going back years, including many that didn’t make the Daily Digest cut, click here.

FYI I produce a monthly digest of digital fiat currency (DFC) developments exclusively for the official sector (e.g., central banks, ministries of finance and international financial institution (e.g., the BIS, IMF, OECD, World Bank)) plus academics and firms that are active in the DFC space (commercial banks, technology providers, consultants, etc.). (DFCs include central bank digital currency (CBDC), stablecoins and tokenized deposits.) It goes out via email on the first business day of every month, and if you’re interested in being on the mailing list, please email me at john@kiffmeister.com.

Protected: Kiffmeister’s Digital Currency Monitor, June 2026

July 1, 2026July 1, 2026 ~ kiffmeister

Kiffmeister’s #Fintech Daily Digest (20260630)

June 30, 2026June 30, 2026 ~ kiffmeister ~ Leave a comment

U.K. BoE and FCA Approach to Joint Regulation of Systemic Stablecoin Issuers (BoE)

The Bank of England (BoE) published a paper that outlines how it and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) will jointly regulate “systemic” stablecoin issuers within the new U.K. stablecoin regime created by recent legislative changes. The paper allocates supervisory remits across the two authorities and the Payment Systems Regulator, explains how issuers move from solo Financial Conduct Authority oversight to joint regulation once HM Treasury recognizes them as systemic, and details transitional tools such as staged onboarding and the BoE’s power of direction. It hard‑codes a more prudentially oriented regime for systemic issuers (backing assets in central bank deposits and short‑term gilts, capital and reserve requirements, issuance guardrails) while leaving conduct, disclosure, and competition issues primarily with the Financial Conduct Authority. Unresolved points include final calibration of failure arrangements, guardrail withdrawal, and rule disapplication mechanics. [BoE]

BTW if you want to see a complete database of my DFC-related posts going back years, including many that didn’t make the Daily Digest cut, click here.

Kiffmeister’s #Fintech Daily Digest (20260629)

June 29, 2026June 29, 2026 ~ kiffmeister ~ Leave a comment

The Macroeconomics of Stablecoins (BIS)

The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) published a paper by Hofmann, Kaldorf and Rottner that argues widespread stablecoin adoption modestly reduces long‑run U.S. output by tightening bank funding and credit, with offsetting fiscal effects from cheaper government debt issuance. The authors embed stablecoins in a macro‑finance and banking model with distortionary fiscal policy, where issuers hold short‑term government bonds, wholesale bank deposits, or central bank reserves under varying regulatory regimes. Stablecoins operate through a bank lending channel that raises deposit rates and funding costs and a fiscal space channel that expands room for tax cuts or spending by lowering Treasury bill yields. In baseline calibration the lending channel slightly dominates, but short‑run transition effects are expansionary and design choices, public debt levels, and foreign demand materially alter the long‑run macro impact and monetary transmission. [BIS]

BTW if you want to see a complete database of my DFC-related posts going back years, including many that didn’t make the Daily Digest cut, click here.

Kiffmeister’s #Fintech Daily Digest (20260622)

June 22, 2026June 22, 2026 ~ kiffmeister ~ Leave a comment

Bank of England Policy Statement and Draft Rules on Regulating Systemic Stablecoins (BoE)

The Bank of England (BoE) published a policy statement and draft code of practice for systemic stablecoin issuers, reflecting extensive engagement with industry and stakeholders that resulted in targeted revisions to the proposals consulted on in 2025. The maximum share held in short-term U.K. government debt has been increased from 60% to 70%, with the remainder in central bank deposits. Also, a temporary issuance guardrail will apply to each systemic stablecoin, initially set at £40 billion, dropping the holding limits (£20,000 on individuals and £10 million on corporations) proposed in the 2025 draft. However, the BoE will ban issuers (directly or indirectly) from paying interest or dividends directly to users for simply holding stablecoins, but will permit activity-based rewards, similarly to the U.S. CLARITY Act currently winding its way through Congress. The BoE is also considering offering a backstop lending facility for eligible, solvent, and viable systemic stablecoin issuers, which would allow them to borrow against short-term sterling-denominated UK government debt securities in a limited set of circumstances. [BoE]

Bank of Korea Digital Currency to Connect with Bank Account Networks (Electronic Times)

Korea’s Electronic Times reports that, as part of Project Han River Phase 2, participating banks are integrating deposit-token infrastructure with their core banking ledgers inside the Bank of Korea (BOK) Naver Cloud test environment. Under the architecture, the BOK issues wholesale central bank digital currency (CBDC) to banks as the interbank settlement asset, while banks issue deposit tokens that users spend via bank-app wallets. The new work links deposit tokens to core deposit, transfer, and accounting systems, including interest accrual and payment, and builds treasury-voucher systems for programmable government subsidy disbursement. Sources frame this as a pre-institutionalization step, moving from “can it settle payments” to “can it run inside production banking systems.” [Electronic Times]

BTW if you want to see a complete database of my DFC-related posts going back years, including many that didn’t make the Daily Digest cut, click here.

Kiffmeister’s #Fintech Daily Digest (20260619)

June 19, 2026June 19, 2026 ~ kiffmeister ~ Leave a comment

Bipartisan US Housing Bill Bans Retail CBDC until 2030 (Senate Banking Committee)

The U.S. Senate Banking Committee and House Financial Services Committee released the latest text of the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act, with backing from the leading Republicans and Democrats on both committees, which includes a ban on central bank digital currency (CBDC) until December 31, 2030. The Act defines a CBDC as a U.S. dollar‑denominated direct Federal Reserve liability widely available to the general public. The text explicitly carves out wholesale CBDC and tokenized reserves (“any dollar-denominated currency that is open, permissionless, and private, and fully preserves the privacy protections of U.S. coins and physical currency. The Senate and the House are expected to formally pass the bill within weeks, and the President is expected to sign the bill once passed. [Senate Banking Committee]

HKEX and HKMA Launch Wholesale CBDC Pilot Project to Facilitate After-Hours Derivatives Trading (HKMA)

Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited (HKEX) and the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) will run a joint pilot using e‑HKD wholesale central bank digital currency (CBDC) operating on a 24/7 basis to fund advance margin for derivatives after‑hours trading while keeping existing operational workflows unchanged. The aim is to improve flexibility and efficiency versus the current cut‑off, under which clearing participants must submit advance margin deposit requests to Hong Kong Futures Exchange Clearing Corporation (HKCC) by 15:00 for them to count toward the after‑hours session. Participants in HKCC can optionally conduct real‑value trial transactions, with broader adoption contingent on regulatory approval and market readiness. [HKMA]

The Trade-Offs Between Different Designs of Tokenized Systems (BoC)

The Bank of Canada (BoC) posted a blog that argues that tokenized systems’ core features—programmability and openness—are not unique to decentralized architectures and can be implemented on centralized platforms as well. It defines design space along two dimensions: validation (centralized, decentralized permissioned, decentralized permissionless) and access (public versus private), and emphasizes that trust models, not “blockchain” per se, determine who controls the ledger and visibility of state. The authors frame the key trade-off as performance versus transparency: centralized systems maximize throughput but minimize transparency; decentralized permissionless systems do the opposite; decentralized permissioned systems sit in between. [BoC]

Digital Assets and Derivatives: Where Next? (ISDA)

The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) published a paper that argues digital assets can be integrated into derivatives markets at institutional scale if settlement, collateral and prudential frameworks are engineered to fit existing regulatory regimes rather than rebuilt from scratch. The paper documents how distributed ledger settlement, continuous margining and portfolio compression can reduce exposure persistence and x‑value adjustment (XVA) type capital charges by roughly 40–45% for a stylized crypto derivatives portfolio, even with unchanged market risk. It emphasizes that balance-sheet efficiency is constrained less by token design than by legal finality, collateral enforceability, exposure recognition under Basel crypto standards and the availability of cash‑leg settlement assets such as tokenized deposits or wholesale central bank digital currencies. Key unresolved issues include conflicts of law for on‑chain property rights, heterogeneous margin model treatment of crypto exposures, limited margin period of risk grade liquidation channels for digital collateral and the need for common standards like the Common Domain Model to avoid infrastructure fragmentation. [ISDA]

Data Externalities, Market Power, and the Optimal CBDC Design (BoC)

The Bank of Canada (BoC) published a paper by Cheng, Davoodalhosseini, Chiu, and Jiang that shows that central bank digital currency (CBDC) economics is complicated by private payment service provider (PSP) transaction data harvesting and sale. A well-designed CBDC should collect some transaction data itself — for fraud detection and financial crime monitoring — but not sell it. Counterintuitively, a U.S.-calibrated model finds that introducing a CBDC would increase rather than reduce PSP data collection, because PSP market power currently dominates – i.e., public competition pushes PSPs to expand their customer base, raising aggregate data output. The reverse holds if PSP competition intensifies, in which case a CBDC designed to curb data monetization would shrink PSPs’ market share and reduce aggregate data production. [BoC]

Stablecoin Remuneration on Centralized Crypto-Asset Exchanges (BIS)

The BIS published a paper by Huang, Tarashev and Wang that argues that the way that crypto exchanges remunerate customer stablecoin holdings drives very different macrofinancial effects. Exchanges either pass through income from low‑risk reserve assets (“reserve-based” remuneration) or use revenues from lending, margin finance and trading (“activity-based”). In the reserve‑based case (e.g., Coinbase), stablecoin remuneration closely tracks policy rates, while in the activity‑based case (e.g., Binance) yields are highly volatile and tied to crypto market conditions and funding demand. Econometric decompositions show crypto‑activity shocks dominate benchmark‑rate shocks in explaining activity‑based yields, especially during 2024 rallies. If stablecoins scale, either of these remuneration models could alter bank and money‑market funding, introduce boom‑bust dynamics and run risks, and reshape monetary policy transmission, with regulatory capital and liquidity requirements a key open mitigant. [BIS]

BTW if you want to see a complete database of my DFC-related posts going back years, including many that didn’t make the Daily Digest cut, click here.

Kiffmeister’s #Fintech Daily Digest (20260612)

June 12, 2026June 12, 2026 ~ kiffmeister ~ Leave a comment

Zelle Heads to India, Unveils ZelleUSDSM Stablecoin For Other Markets (Zelle)

Early Warning, the operator of U.S. fast payment system (FPS) Zelle, will launch Zelle in India first for U.S. consumers sending money to family and friends abroad, with initial availability expected before year-end, and it also introduced ZelleUSD (ZLUSD), a U.S. dollar-backed stablecoin intended to support future international payments in other markets. The company framed the move as an expansion of its domestic payments network into cross-border remittances, saying financial institutions could offer near-instant transfers through existing banks and credit unions. [Zelle]

The Anatomy of Stablecoin Transactions (BIS)

The BIS published a paper by Schär, Kosse, Rice, Shirakami, and Siridhasanakul that analyze 593 million Ethereum event logs across 141 million transactions to argue that stablecoin transfers are routinely embedded within atomically executed bundles combining trading, lending, and settlement, distorting standard interpretations of stablecoin activity. While 31.6% of transactions involve such complexity, these generate nearly 60% of all transfer events, meaning transfer-level data misclassifies most observations as standalone payments. USDT, USDC, and PYUSD differ systematically in co-usage, computational burden, urgency, and business-hour alignment, reflecting distinct institutional designs rather than interchangeability. The action-set classification offers supervisors a basis for activity-based oversight, while divergent jurisdictional timing patterns underscore the need for cross-border data-sharing among regulators. [BIS]

Stakeholder Engagement and Roadmap for Philippines Wholesale CBDC (IMF)

The IMF published a technical assistance report on stakeholder engagement and roadmap development for Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas’s (BSP’s) Project Agila wholesale central bank digital currency (wCBDC) project. As part of this work, tokenized government bond settlement and cross-border payments were identified as priority wCBDC use cases. Workshops with financial institutions, the Bureau of the Treasury, and market infrastructure providers highlighted real-time gross settlement (RTGS) system settlement-window limitations, capital market shallowness, and correspondent-banking-dependent cross-border payment inefficiencies. The roadmap calls for cost-benefit analysis of wCBDC against alternatives including trigger solutions and omnibus accounts, although the Securities Clearing Corporation (SCCP) prefers its existing fee-free settlement-bank arrangements, which also provide netting and liquidity-saving features not easily replicated on RTGS, over direct settlement access. Legal framework gaps and financial integrity regulation compliance remain key open issues. [IMF]

BTW if you want to see a complete database of my DFC-related posts going back years, including many that didn’t make the Daily Digest cut, click here.

Kiffmeister’s #Fintech Daily Digest (20260606)

June 6, 2026June 6, 2026 ~ kiffmeister ~ Leave a comment

Bank of Uganda Publishes Short List of Potential CBDC Consultants (BOU)

[May 26, 2026] The Bank of Uganda (BOU) published its expressions of interest short list of sixteen consultants to conduct a comprehensive feasibility study on issuing a central bank digital currency (CBDC) in Uganda. The contract will cover technical infrastructure, legal and regulatory aspects, economic and social impacts, operational viability, and a detailed cost-benefit analysis using both quantitative and qualitative methods. The selected firm will assess national digital and payments infrastructure, propose and apply a robust methodology, and deliver specified reports demonstrating understanding, relevant experience, and a workplan. The usual suspects (G+F, eCurrency and Soramitsu, all CBDC platform vendors) are at the top of the scoreboard. [BOU]

The Fragility of Perfectly Safe Digital Money (FRB)

The U.S. Federal Reserve (FRB) published a paper by Klee, Lubis, Ross, Ross, and Vardoulakis that shows how permissionless blockchain-based stablecoins are made fragile and prone to self-reinforcing redemption runs by way that they “unbundle” trust. Network externalities and congestion-sensitive gas fees interact to generate strategic complementarities in redemption decisions, producing runs even when reserves are perfectly safe. The global games model yields a discrete redemption regime shift, not a smooth response, once congestion crosses a threshold falling as network externalities weaken. Panel regressions on five Ethereum stablecoins (2017–2025) show congestion alone does not drive redemptions; only its interaction with low network externalities does, concentrated in the upper tail of the congestion distribution. Hence, frameworks targeting reserve quality, such as the GENIUS Act and MiCA, address the liability but not the rail, and central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) and tokenized deposits circulating on permissionless blockchains inherit the same fragility. [FRB]

BTW if you want to see a complete database of my DFC-related posts going back years, including many that didn’t make the Daily Digest cut, click here.

Kiffmeister’s #Fintech Daily Digest (20260605)

June 5, 2026June 6, 2026 ~ kiffmeister

Macau Banks execute $160 million Cross-Border Transactions on First Day of mBridge Participation (AMCM)

The Monetary Authority of Macao (AMCM) joined the multilateral central bank digital currency bridge (mBridge) earlier this year (2026) and officially launched the system on June 2. Three local commercial banks processed 23 cross-border transactions totaling nearly 13 billion patacas ($160 million), mainly for trade settlement and remittances linking Mainland China, Hong Kong, and the United Arab Emirates. The launch constitutes Macau’s initial live deployment of central bank digital currency (CBDC) infrastructure for cross-border settlement and follows the MAM’s accession as a full mBridge member in a project explicitly positioned to enable multi-currency payments without intermediation by the U.S. dollar. Early operations were technically stable, with eight additional licensed banks still in onboarding. [AMCM]

Major US Banks to Launch Tokenized Deposit Network in 2027 (Finextra)

JPMorgan, Citi, Bank of America, and Wells Fargo reportedly plan a shared blockchain network for tokenized deposits, targeting launch in early 2027. The platform tokenizes commercial bank deposits on a closed-loop, netted infrastructure broadly analogous to existing deposit clearing, but upgraded to 24/7 availability and native programmability. Strategically, it is a defensive response to open-loop stablecoins and cross‑border tokenized‑deposit offerings that enable balances to exit the banking system and settle globally on weekends and off-hours. The key unresolved issues are whether this consortium rail delivers incremental functionality beyond today’s clearing and real‑time payment systems, and how its closed architecture will compete with, or interoperate with, global stablecoin networks. [Finextra]

Even in Stablecoins, Europe Finds a Way to do it in Pieces (Blockstories)

Bancomat is positioning Eur.Bank as a euro stablecoin embedded in the domestic card and account‑to‑account network, with reserves deliberately booked on issuing banks’ balance sheets rather than in segregated custody, so that liquidity never leaves the traditional banking system. Nine Bancomat member banks will test interbank transactions, effectively treating Eur.Bank as a shared settlement instrument across participants. The overlap between Bancomat’s Eur.Bank banks and the Qivalis consortium underlines Italy’s strategy of running parallel design experiments on reserve treatment and balance‑sheet integration rather than converging early on a single stablecoin architecture. [Blockstories]

BTW if you want to see a complete database of my DFC-related posts going back years, including many that didn’t make the Daily Digest cut, click here.

Kiffmeister’s #Fintech Daily Digest (20260604)

June 4, 2026June 5, 2026 ~ kiffmeister

Stablecoins: Waiting for Regulation (U.K. House of Lords)

The U.K. House of Lords Financial Services Regulation Committee published a report that examines the development and proposed regulation of stablecoins in the United Kingdom. It argues that the UK should finalize a clear stablecoin regime quickly, because regulatory uncertainty is already suppressing sterling stablecoin development even as the global market has surged past $310 billion and remains dominated by dollar-linked coins. It finds real upside in faster, cheaper cross-border and programmable payments, but says the main risks are financial stability, possible bank disintermediation, consumer protection, and illicit finance. The report broadly supports 1:1 backing and the Bank of England’s backstop lending facility, but says the proposed 40 percent unremunerated central bank deposit requirement, one-day par redemption rule, and temporary holding limits may be too restrictive. [U.K. House of Lords]

Making Stablecoins Stable(r): Can Regulation Help? (BIS)

The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) published a paper by T. Goel, U. Lewrick and I. Agarwal that develops a dynamic model of a fiat‑backed stablecoin issuer showing that unregulated issuers optimally hold minimal capital and large bond portfolios, creating default and fire‑sale spillover risks when redemptions force bond sales. Regulation is modeled as liquidity‑ratio and capital‑ratio thresholds treated as usable buffers that, when breached, trigger additional outflows via coin‑holder discipline, endogenizing flow dynamics. Liquidity thresholds mainly raise cash holdings, while capital thresholds increase both capital and cash, so each tool affects default probability and market‑impact risk through distinct balance‑sheet channels. Calibrated to major stablecoin flows and U.S. Treasury money market depth, the framework yields a two‑way map between target default and price‑impact levels and implied capital–liquidity threshold combinations, but optimal calibration remains sensitive to assumptions about the social value of stablecoins. [BIS]

BTW if you want to see a complete database of my DFC-related posts going back years, including many that didn’t make the Daily Digest cut, click here.