Kiffmeister’s #Fintech Daily Digest (20260925)

HKMA to Introduce Wholesale CBDC as Project EnsembleTX Settlement Asset (HKMA)

The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) is planning to make a wholesale central bank digital currency (CBDC) available for interbank settlement of tokenized deposits as part of Project EnsembleTX, enabling 24/7 payments by around the end of 2026, and will continue to explore more use cases for tokenized deposits. The pilot, launched in November 2025, initially used the HKD real-time gross settlement (RTGS) system to settle the transactions. [HKMA]

ECB Assessing Feasibility of Interlinking TIPS with Brazil’s Pix (ECB)

The European Central Bank (ECB) will assess the feasibility of linking the Eurosystem’s TARGET Instant Payment Settlement (TIPS) platform to Central Bank of Brazil’s Pix instant-payment system. A link could make payments between the euro area and Brazil faster and cheaper, extending the Eurosystem’s broader effort to connect TIPS with foreign instant-payment systems. However, technical, operational, legal and business arrangements remain to be evaluated. [ECB]

US FRB Proposes Rules for FRB-Regulated Stablecoin Issuers (FRB)

The U.S. Federal Reserve Board (FRB) proposed two rules to implement the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act for FRB-supervised payment stablecoin issuers: one governing issuance, reserves and supervision, and another governing applications by supervised banks. The first would require full backing with eligible liquid assets, including short-term Treasury bills, and set capital and risk-management standards; it would also regulate reserve-asset safekeeping and clarify permissible bank activities. The second would require applicants to provide a business plan and financial information and establish procedures for appeals and final decisions. Their final terms remain subject to comment, due 60 days after Federal Register publication. [FRB]

BTW if you want to see a complete database of my DFC-related posts going back years, including many that didn’t make the Daily Digest cut, click here.

FYI I produce a monthly digest of digital fiat currency (DFC) developments exclusively for the official sector (e.g., central banks, ministries of finance and international financial institution (e.g., the BIS, IMF, OECD, World Bank)) plus academics and firms that are active in the DFC space (commercial banks, technology providers, consultants, etc.). (DFCs include central bank digital currency (CBDC), stablecoins and tokenized deposits.) It goes out via email on the first business day of every month, and if you’re interested in being on the mailing list, please email me at john@kiffmeister.com.

Kiffmeister’s #Fintech Daily Digest (20260920)

Saudi Arabia Quits mBridge Cross-Border Currency Platform (FT)

The Financial Times (FT) reported that the Saudi Arabian Monetary Authority (SAMA) withdrew from the blockchain-based mBridge cross-border payments platform on May 13, 2025. SAMA joined the project as an observing member in 2023, and became an active participant in 2024, joining China, Hong Kong, Thailand, the United Arab Emirates and the Bank for International Settlements (BIS). The BIS “graduated out” of the project in October 2024. SAMA said in a statement provided to the FT that “as planned, SAMA successfully completed its mBridge [proof of concept (PoC)] on 13 May 2025 [and] following the completion of the PoC, SAMA is no longer a participating member of mBridge.” [FT]

BTW if you want to see a complete database of my DFC-related posts going back years, including many that didn’t make the Daily Digest cut, click here.

FYI I produce a monthly digest of digital fiat currency (DFC) developments exclusively for the official sector (e.g., central banks, ministries of finance and international financial institution (e.g., the BIS, IMF, OECD, World Bank)) plus academics and firms that are active in the DFC space (commercial banks, technology providers, consultants, etc.). (DFCs include central bank digital currency (CBDC), stablecoins and tokenized deposits.) It goes out via email on the first business day of every month, and if you’re interested in being on the mailing list, please email me at john@kiffmeister.com.

Kiffmeister’s #Fintech Daily Digest (20260913)

Safe Settlement Assets for Wholesale Tokenized Financial Markets (LinkedIn)

Drawing on remarks delivered at the recent Currency Research Central Bank Payments Conference, Ashley Lannquist (Glenbrook Partners) set out a decision framework for policymakers weighing which form of settlement asset should support safe large-scale tokenized financial markets — settled on distributed ledger technology (DLT). (“Large-scale” denotes markets that would ordinarily settle on a systemically important financial market infrastructure such as a central securities depository or securities settlement system.) Once such activity migrates onto DLT, safety concerns compel a choice governed by whether the asset (1) should be central bank money and (2) should be “on-chain.” The resulting matrix maps to wholesale central bank digital currency (CBDC) (yes/yes), real-time gross settlement (RTGS) synchronization (yes/no), regulated asset-backed stablecoins, tokenized e-money, or tokenized bank deposits (no/yes), and bank deposits (no/no). The framework is not prescriptive, being conditional on country context and acknowledging unresolved empirical questions about benefits and risks. [LinkedIn]

Fast Payment Systems and the Cost of Remittances (Banca d’Italia)

A Banca d’Italia paper by Brandi, Di Iorio, and Nobili concludes that adopting domestic fast payment systems (FPS) reduces inbound remittance costs by roughly 0.25 percentage points. It finds this is primarily achieved by compressing foreign exchange margins via increased non-bank competition. However, the authors temper these findings by highlighting significant regional heterogeneity, noting zero statistically significant cost reductions in Latin America and Europe. Furthermore, they question causality, acknowledging that FPS adoption often coincides with broader regulatory modernization. To defend their thesis, the authors employ an instrumental variable approach using market provider density to isolate whether the FPS itself is the true catalyst for the observed competition and subsequent cost compression. [Banca d’Italia]

BTW if you want to see a complete database of my DFC-related posts going back years, including many that didn’t make the Daily Digest cut, click here.

FYI I produce a monthly digest of digital fiat currency (DFC) developments exclusively for the official sector (e.g., central banks, ministries of finance and international financial institution (e.g., the BIS, IMF, OECD, World Bank)) plus academics and firms that are active in the DFC space (commercial banks, technology providers, consultants, etc.). (DFCs include central bank digital currency (CBDC), stablecoins and tokenized deposits.) It goes out via email on the first business day of every month, and if you’re interested in being on the mailing list, please email me at john@kiffmeister.com.

Kiffmeister’s #Fintech Daily Digest (20260910)

The Stablecoin Transfer Volume Number in Most Board Packs is Misleading (AI-Mabrook)

In its third quarter 2026 Digital Assets Executive Industry Update Al-Mabrook Financial questions the reliability of headline stablecoin transfer volume metrics, challenging the oft-cited $62 trillion transfer volume for 2025 as a true measure of adoption. The data suggests it is not, filtering gross volume down to just $350–$550 billion in genuine real-economy payments. Business-to-business transactions ($150 to $230 billion) dominate this legitimate flow because traditional rails remain inefficient, followed by consumer-to-consumer remittances and consumer-to-business payments ($90 to $130 billion each). Business-to-consumer flow, largely payroll and marketplace payouts, accounts for the remainder. [AI-Mabrook]

Stablecoin Multi-Country Issuance and Dollar-Run Risks in Europe (CEPR)

A Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) paper by Martino, Monnet, and Perotti critically examines the systemic risks posed by multi-country issuance of USD-denominated stablecoins. The authors argue that because the European Union (EU) Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulations guarantees unconditional, par-value redemptions—unlike proposed U.S. regulations that permit fees and gates—technologically fungible tokens create dangerous avenues for cross-border redemption arbitrage. In times of stress, this regulatory asymmetry incentivizes rational holders to offload dollar-run risks entirely onto EU-based issuers. Conceding that structural bans on multi-country issuance are politically unlikely, the authors propose a pragmatic mitigation strategy to achieve “functional redemption equivalence.” They advocate mandating automatic, smart-contract-embedded contingent measures, specifically sequencing redemption fees ahead of hard gates, to deter self-fulfilling runs. Furthermore, the paper recommends granting the European Central Bank powers to suspend non-euro stablecoin redemptions during severe crises, aiming to safeguard EU monetary sovereignty against unhedgeable USD stablecoin market contagion. [CEPR]

Privacy in Wholesale Cross-Border Payments: Assessing Project Agorá (SUERF)

A Société Universitaire Européenne de Recherches Financières (SUERF) paper by Jan Camenisch and the Swiss National Bank’s Thomas Moser evaluates the privacy architecture of the Bank for International Settlements Project Agorá, a distributed ledger initiative for wholesale cross-border payments, against five design objectives. The authors note that Agorá utilizes the Paladin framework to achieve selective disclosure, regulatory access, and multijurisdictional configurability with low computational overhead. However, the assessment highlights significant architectural trade-offs. By relying on issuer-delegated verification rather than trustless systems, the design concentrates information and trust within issuing entities. Additionally, keeping private state off-ledger introduces resilience challenges, and the network remains vulnerable to metadata leakage. Ultimately, the paper concludes that while Agorá is operationally pragmatic, future phases must address off-chain state management and metadata vulnerabilities. [SUERF]

BTW if you want to see a complete database of my DFC-related posts going back years, including many that didn’t make the Daily Digest cut, click here.

FYI I produce a monthly digest of digital fiat currency (DFC) developments exclusively for the official sector (e.g., central banks, ministries of finance and international financial institution (e.g., the BIS, IMF, OECD, World Bank)) plus academics and firms that are active in the DFC space (commercial banks, technology providers, consultants, etc.). (DFCs include central bank digital currency (CBDC), stablecoins and tokenized deposits.) It goes out via email on the first business day of every month, and if you’re interested in being on the mailing list, please email me at john@kiffmeister.com.

Kiffmeister’s #Fintech Daily Digest (20260909)

The Multi-Issuance Issue (SSRN)

A paper posted by Ulrich Bindseil and others critically examines the viability under European Union (EU) Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulations, of stablecoin arrangements in which entities inside and outside the EU issue and redeem a single fungible stablecoin, each backing only the tokens it has itself issued. The authors use a financial accounts framework covering the two issuing entities, their custodian banks, holders, and an arbitrageur, to argue that token fungibility could inadvertently concentrate redemption pressure on EU-based issuers during stress events, potentially depleting local reserves. Furthermore, they question the efficacy of localized reserve mandates, positing that such requirements are either redundant if foreign frameworks are robust, or structurally flawed if they force dollar-denominated tokens into inferior offshore accounts. Ultimately, the paper advocates for an equivalence regime that allows direct EU distribution of foreign-issued stablecoins, despite reliance on foreign regulatory parity not completely safeguarding the EU against cross-border contagion. [SSRN]

eCurrency Unveils Secure eOffline CBDC (PR Newswire)

eCurrency Mint announced its Secure eOffline central bank digital currency (CBDC) solution, demonstrated in Africa, enabling consumers, merchants, and government agencies to transact CBDC without internet or mobile connectivity via partner-supplied phones, smart cards, or dedicated hardware. It positions offline capability as parity with cash and a lever for financial inclusion within eCurrency’s existing Digital Symmetric Core Currency Cryptography (DSC3) infrastructure. However, the release provides no technical detail on offline settlement finality, double-spend prevention, or reconciliation upon reconnection. [PR Newswire]

Central Banks On-Chain (ECB)

Discussing Darrell Duffie’s “Tokenized Finance and the Perimeter of Central Banking” paper at the 2026 Jackson Hole Conference, European Central Bank (ECB) Executive Board Member Isabel Schnabel argued that wholesale tokenization requires an ultimate settlement asset that is both risk-free and elastically supplied. Challenging Duffie’s perimeter conservatism, she maintained that stablecoins cannot replicate central bank liquidity provision under systemic stress, and that proxy or bridge models preserve fragmentation while leaving policy operations off-chain. Citing the need to defend European monetary sovereignty against the rise of foreign-currency stablecoins, she advocated for native tokenized central bank reserves to enable atomic repo, automated collateral management, and 24/7 liquidity facilities. Schnabel framed the central design choice as a trade-off between common ledgers—which maximize atomicity and integration—and interoperable networks, which better mitigate concentration, governance, operational resilience, and technology lock-in risks. [ECB]

BTW if you want to see a complete database of my DFC-related posts going back years, including many that didn’t make the Daily Digest cut, click here.

FYI I produce a monthly digest of digital fiat currency (DFC) developments exclusively for the official sector (e.g., central banks, ministries of finance and international financial institution (e.g., the BIS, IMF, OECD, World Bank)) plus academics and firms that are active in the DFC space (commercial banks, technology providers, consultants, etc.). (DFCs include central bank digital currency (CBDC), stablecoins and tokenized deposits.) It goes out via email on the first business day of every month, and if you’re interested in being on the mailing list, please email me at john@kiffmeister.com.

Kiffmeister’s #Fintech Daily Digest (20260904)

Brazilian and European Central Banks are Negotiating to Connect Their Instant Payment Systems (Folha de S.Paulo)

Banco Central do Brasil (BCB) is reportedly negotiating with the European Central Bank (ECB) to connect its Pix instant payment system to the ECB’s Trans-European Automated Real-time Gross Settlement Express Transfer System (TARGET) Instant Payment Settlement (TIPS) platform. The talks are in a preliminary phase but are already included in the ECB’s work schedule with its studies for the connection currently in the pre-investigation phase, with legal, technical, security, and operational analyses expected to be completed by the end of September. If negotiations progress, the expectation is to launch an operational pilot program in June 2028. [Folha de S.Paulo]
https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/internacional/es/economia/2026/09/brasil-negocia-conectar-el-sistema-de-pagos-instantaneos-con-la-plataforma-europea.shtml

Designing Retail CBDCs: A Systematic Literature Review of Trade-Offs Between Security, Privacy, and Financial Stability (IJFS)

A systematic review of 140 peer-reviewed articles in the International Journal of Financial Studies (IJFS) examines retail central bank digital currency (CBDC) design considerations, proposing a structural “CBDC design trilemma.” This framework asserts that retail CBDCs cannot simultaneously maximize privacy, financial stability, and regulatory compliance. The study finds scholarly consensus converging on a suboptimal “zone of compromise” — specifically two-tier architectures with tiered privacy — where stabilizing features inherently degrade user adoption or anonymity. This operationalizes these trade-offs for policymakers, clarifying that technical innovations cannot fully dissolve fundamental tensions between regulatory mandates and disintermediation risks. However, whether this theoretical trilemma strictly binds in practice remains unverified, given a critical deficit of empirical data from live deployments.” [IJFD]

BTW if you want to see a complete database of my DFC-related posts going back years, including many that didn’t make the Daily Digest cut, click here.

FYI I produce a monthly digest of digital fiat currency (DFC) developments exclusively for the official sector (e.g., central banks, ministries of finance and international financial institution (e.g., the BIS, IMF, OECD, World Bank)) plus academics and firms that are active in the DFC space (commercial banks, technology providers, consultants, etc.). (DFCs include central bank digital currency (CBDC), stablecoins and tokenized deposits.) It goes out via email on the first business day of every month, and if you’re interested in being on the mailing list, please email me at john@kiffmeister.com.

Kiffmeister’s #Fintech Daily Digest (20260812)

BRICS Countries Discussing Linking CBDCs and Fast Payment Systems (Nagaland Post)

Reserve Bank of India (RBI) Governor Sanjay Malhotra reportedly said that BRICS nations are discussing linking central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) and fast payment systems (FPSs) to facilitate cheaper and faster cross-border funds transfers. The BRICS countries are Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Indonesia, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Governor Malhotra also reportedly said that efforts are on to internationalize the rupee, including by expanding the number of memorandums of understanding (MoUs) between central banks that it signs for promoting bilateral trade in local currencies. At present, India and the RBI have signed such agreements with Indonesia, Maldives, Mauritius and the UAE. [Nagaland Post]

India to Launch CBDC-Based Direct Benefit Transfer POC in Chandigarh and Dadra & Nagar Haveli (GOI)

The Government of India (GOI) will launch programmable central bank digital currency (CBDC) based direct benefit transfers (DBTs) under the Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Anna Yojana (PMGKAY) food subsidy program in the Territories of Chandigarh and Dadra & Nagar Haveli on August 14. With the launch of this scheme the subsidies will be transferred to eligible PMGKAY beneficiaries in the form of programmable digital rupee tokens directly into their CBDC wallets, instead of via traditional bank account transfers. This subsidy can be used to purchase food grains from listed merchants through a secure , trackable, and real-time digital payment system. The aim is to ensure transparent and thorough distribution of public funds , while also reducing leakages , embezzlement, and cash transactions associated with traditional subsidy distribution mechanisms. It will facilitate quick and secure transfer of benefits to beneficiaries and promote financial inclusion through simple wallet-based transactions. This initiative builds on pilots carried out earlier in 2026 in Puducherry and Gujarat, and is envisioned as a proof-of-concept for the nation and a scalable template for adoption by other states and territories. [GOI]

Tokenized Deposits: Old Wine in New Bottles? (SUERF)

SUERF published a policy note by Alistair Milne that argues tokenized deposits offer little operational novelty over conventional account-based deposits, since the automation, programmability, and 24/7 processing attributed to distributed ledger technology are equally achievable on centralized ledgers. Decentralization’s only distinct capability is pseudonymous transfer without intermediaries—which banks are not pursuing. Tokenized deposits’ genuine appeal is confined to “on-us” transactions on a single bank’s balance sheet, avoiding interbank settlement complexity. JP Morgan’s Kinexys, adopted for corporate multi-currency cash management, exemplifies this, but reflects business logic rather than ledger technology. Milne characterizes bank tokenization efforts as a defensive marketing response to the stablecoin threat. Open questions include whether interoperability initiatives such as UK Finance’s tokenized sterling deposits project can generate domestic adoption incentives, and whether capital markets tokenization—requiring 100% reserving and settlement-asset recognition—warrants separate assessment. [SUERF]

BTW if you want to see a complete database of my DFC-related posts going back years, including many that didn’t make the Daily Digest cut, click here.

FYI I produce a monthly digest of digital fiat currency (DFC) developments exclusively for the official sector (e.g., central banks, ministries of finance and international financial institution (e.g., the BIS, IMF, OECD, World Bank)) plus academics and firms that are active in the DFC space (commercial banks, technology providers, consultants, etc.). (DFCs include central bank digital currency (CBDC), stablecoins and tokenized deposits.) It goes out via email on the first business day of every month, and if you’re interested in being on the mailing list, please email me at john@kiffmeister.com.

Kiffmeister’s #Fintech Daily Digest (20260811)

Latest Pix Management Report Presents Agenda for its Future Evolution (BCB)

Banco Central do Brasil (BCB) published an update on the main advances of the Pix ecosystem between 2023 and 2025, the results achieved by the instant payment system (IPS) and the prospects for its evolution in the coming years. Looking ahead, the BCB is discussing bilateral connections and participation in multilateral instant payment hubs. Existing models let Brazilians pay abroad and non-residents pay in Brazil through partnerships with foreign institutions and Pix QR codes, but Pix itself settles only the domestic real leg, with the corresponding foreign-currency transfer occurring later through conventional remittance rails. Connecting Pix to foreign IPSs via bilateral links and multilateral hubs could enable remittances and merchant payments with local-currency availability within seconds, while reducing fees, improving speed, access, and transparency. [BCB]

BTW if you want to see a complete database of my DFC-related posts going back years, including many that didn’t make the Daily Digest cut, click here.

FYI I produce a monthly digest of digital fiat currency (DFC) developments exclusively for the official sector (e.g., central banks, ministries of finance and international financial institution (e.g., the BIS, IMF, OECD, World Bank)) plus academics and firms that are active in the DFC space (commercial banks, technology providers, consultants, etc.). (DFCs include central bank digital currency (CBDC), stablecoins and tokenized deposits.) It goes out via email on the first business day of every month, and if you’re interested in being on the mailing list, please email me at john@kiffmeister.com.

Kiffmeister’s #Fintech Daily Digest (20260802)

China Cuts Durian Settlement to 30 Minutes with First Outbound e-CNY Payment to Malaysia (SCMP)

China has completed its first outbound payment via the Cross‑Border e‑CNY Express Service (CBETS) to Malaysia, settling a 43,000 yuan shipment of fresh durian. The transaction was executed by China Construction Bank’s Xiamen branch in coordination with its Labuan branch in Malaysia, using direct bank‑to‑bank ledger transfers and on‑the‑fly conversion into Malaysian ringgit. Compared with traditional correspondent banking networks operating under the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (SWIFT) system, this cut settlement to 30 minutes from one to three days and eliminated clearing fees of up to 6% and per‑transaction charges of $25 to $35. CBETS, operated by the e‑CNY International Operation Center under the guidance of the People’s Bank of China’s Digital Currency Institute, provides on‑chain and off‑chain connectivity and 24/7 cross‑border settlement. [SCMP]

FYI most publications are presenting this as a central bank digital currency (CBDC) story, but there’s no concrete evidence that it is. For starters, the Peoples Bank of China (PBOC) announced earlier in the year that the e-CNY is now a tokenized commercial bank deposit-based platform. And earlier stories going back to September 2025 (see below) that I missed make it clear that the Cross‑Border e‑CNY Express Service (CBETS) platform is only operating under PBOC guidance, so none of these platforms are CBDC-based according to the core part of the CBDC definition; a direct liability of the central bank.

26 Financial Institutions Sign On as direct participants with e-CNY Center International (SCIO)

[June 17, 2026] The State Council Information Office of China (SCIO) announced that the e‑CNY International Operation Center, which operates under the guidance of the Digital Currency Institute of the People’s Bank of China, has enrolled 26 institutions as direct participants on its Cross-Border e-CNY Transfer Services (CBETS) platform. Since the beginning of 2026, the e-CNY International Operations Center, which commenced operations in September 2025, has upgraded its three major platforms into the CBETS. CBETS provides on-chain and off-chain connectivity and 24/7 settlement, reducing reliance on three-to-five intermediary correspondent banks per transaction. The 26 aforementioned institutions include Standard Chartered China and Chinese bank branches in Thailand, Singapore, Laos, and Qatar. [SCIO]

e-CNY International Operation Center Officially Launched in Shanghai (PBOC)

[September 25, 2025] The People’s Bank of China (PBOC) formally launched the e‑CNY International Operation Center in Shanghai to provide dedicated infrastructure for cross‑border use of the digital renminbi, framed as part of a broader upgrade of monetary and payment systems. The center’s three core “business platforms” are a cross‑border digital payment platform, a blockchain service platform, and a digital asset platform, together supporting e‑CNY cross‑border settlement, asset tokenization, and related digital financial services. Institutionally, the PBOC’s Digital Currency Institute will build and operate these systems, with a mandate to connect domestic and foreign financial infrastructures and support international operation of e‑CNY. [PBOC]

BTW if you want to see a complete database of my DFC-related posts going back years, including many that didn’t make the Daily Digest cut, click here.

FYI I produce a monthly digest of digital fiat currency (DFC) developments exclusively for the official sector (e.g., central banks, ministries of finance and international financial institution (e.g., the BIS, IMF, OECD, World Bank)) plus academics and firms that are active in the DFC space (commercial banks, technology providers, consultants, etc.). (DFCs include central bank digital currency (CBDC), stablecoins and tokenized deposits.) It goes out via email on the first business day of every month, and if you’re interested in being on the mailing list, please email me at john@kiffmeister.com.

Kiffmeister’s #Fintech Daily Digest (20260730)

Project Agorá Real Value Testing (BIS)

The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) and Institute of International Finance (IIF) completed real value testing of their Project Agorá multi‑currency programmable platform for atomically settled wholesale cross‑border payments using wholesale central bank digital currency (CBDC) and tokenized commercial bank deposits. The trials involved 28 private-sector financial institutions and central banks executing approximately CHF 800,000 in transactions across 17 scenarios (corporate, interbank, intra-group, and payment‑versus‑payment) and six major currencies (CHF, EUR, GBP, JPY, KRW, USD) across Asia, Europe and North America, with end‑to‑end processing averaging 80 seconds from submission to settlement. The exercise focused on feasibility and operational performance under realistic conditions, highlighting improvements in speed, transparency, and status/routing visibility relative to existing correspondent banking architectures. However, still to be resolved are questions around legal treatment of tokenized claims, settlement finality, data‑sharing, and governance models. [BIS]

Are Stablecoins Efficient for Remittances? Evidence from a Mystery Shopping Exercise (Banca d’Italia)

Banca d’Italia published a paper that finds stablecoin-based remittances offer no systematic cost advantage over traditional channels, based on a mystery shopping exercise. Researchers transacting as ordinary customers transferred 200 USD Coin (USDC) across ten corridors linking Italy with Argentina, Brazil, South Africa, the UAE, and Japan. Total costs ranged from 0.30% to nearly 9%, with the on-chain transfer contributing a marginal 0.4%; the on- and off-ramp fiat-conversion steps, exchange fees, and funding method drove costs and duration. Speed depended on domestic payment infrastructure: instant-payment jurisdictions (Brazil’s PIX, Italy’s TIPS) settled end-to-end under 20 minutes, while standard bank transfers extended settlement to one or two days. Regulatory design shaped operator availability and feasibility. However, cross-corridor comparability is confounded by Argentina’s parallel exchange rates and single-stablecoin, and single-transaction scope limits generalization. [Banca d’Italia]

BTW if you want to see a complete database of my DFC-related posts going back years, including many that didn’t make the Daily Digest cut, click here.

FYI I produce a monthly digest of digital fiat currency (DFC) developments exclusively for the official sector (e.g., central banks, ministries of finance and international financial institution (e.g., the BIS, IMF, OECD, World Bank)) plus academics and firms that are active in the DFC space (commercial banks, technology providers, consultants, etc.). (DFCs include central bank digital currency (CBDC), stablecoins and tokenized deposits.) It goes out via email on the first business day of every month, and if you’re interested in being on the mailing list, please email me at john@kiffmeister.com.