Category: Deposit Tokens
Kiffmeister’s #Fintech Daily Digest (20260827)
Meeting the Challenge of Correspondent Bank Relationship Withdrawals in fully Dollarized Microstates (SSRN)
I have just completed a first draft of a paper that examines emerging digital financial infrastructure and instruments as potential complements to the standard prescriptions aimed at mitigating the domestic financial system risks risks of correspondent banking relationship (CBR) withdrawal in officially dollarized microstates. Such microstates surrender the monetary autonomy of a central bank in exchange for the stability of a foreign currency, and in doing so make their domestic financial systems dependent on CBRs that global banks are increasingly unwilling to maintain. The existing IMF and World Bank literature treats CBR withdrawal primarily as a cross-border payments problem, and its prescriptions are addressed to that dimension. This paper assesses the capacity of emerging digital financial infrastructure and instruments to sustain domestic financial system functionality independent of a CBR, and the extent to which they may allow governments to recapture economic benefits analogous in some respects to the seigniorage that dollarization forgoes. Comments please! [SSRN]
Tokenized Deposits Could Affect Bank Liquidity, Maturity Transformation (Dallas Fed)
The U.S. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (Dallas Fed) published an article that claims that widespread tokenized-deposit adoption could erode banks’ maturity-transformation capacity and increase liquidity needs, in the context of real-time payments, stablecoin competition, and emerging bank-led on-chain deposit models. By making deposits more transferable and rate-sensitive, tokenization could shorten their expected life and raise deposit betas, reducing the effective duration that supports longer-term lending. The authors estimate that deposits support roughly 80% of aggregate bank duration exposure; a 10% reduction in deposit life or increase in rate sensitivity could materially reduce capacity or require more term funding, raising credit costs. Faster outflows could also increase demand for reserves and Treasuries. [Dallas Fed]
BTW if you want to see a complete database of my DFC-related posts going back years, including many that didn’t make the Daily Digest cut, click here.
FYI I produce a monthly digest of digital fiat currency (DFC) developments exclusively for the official sector (e.g., central banks, ministries of finance and international financial institution (e.g., the BIS, IMF, OECD, World Bank)) plus academics and firms that are active in the DFC space (commercial banks, technology providers, consultants, etc.). (DFCs include central bank digital currency (CBDC), stablecoins and tokenized deposits.) It goes out via email on the first business day of every month, and if you’re interested in being on the mailing list, please email me at john@kiffmeister.com.
Kiffmeister’s #Fintech Daily Digest (20260812)
BRICS Countries Discussing Linking CBDCs and Fast Payment Systems (Nagaland Post)
Reserve Bank of India (RBI) Governor Sanjay Malhotra reportedly said that BRICS nations are discussing linking central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) and fast payment systems (FPSs) to facilitate cheaper and faster cross-border funds transfers. The BRICS countries are Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Indonesia, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Governor Malhotra also reportedly said that efforts are on to internationalize the rupee, including by expanding the number of memorandums of understanding (MoUs) between central banks that it signs for promoting bilateral trade in local currencies. At present, India and the RBI have signed such agreements with Indonesia, Maldives, Mauritius and the UAE. [Nagaland Post]
India to Launch CBDC-Based Direct Benefit Transfer POC in Chandigarh and Dadra & Nagar Haveli (GOI)
The Government of India (GOI) will launch programmable central bank digital currency (CBDC) based direct benefit transfers (DBTs) under the Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Anna Yojana (PMGKAY) food subsidy program in the Territories of Chandigarh and Dadra & Nagar Haveli on August 14. With the launch of this scheme the subsidies will be transferred to eligible PMGKAY beneficiaries in the form of programmable digital rupee tokens directly into their CBDC wallets, instead of via traditional bank account transfers. This subsidy can be used to purchase food grains from listed merchants through a secure , trackable, and real-time digital payment system. The aim is to ensure transparent and thorough distribution of public funds , while also reducing leakages , embezzlement, and cash transactions associated with traditional subsidy distribution mechanisms. It will facilitate quick and secure transfer of benefits to beneficiaries and promote financial inclusion through simple wallet-based transactions. This initiative builds on pilots carried out earlier in 2026 in Puducherry and Gujarat, and is envisioned as a proof-of-concept for the nation and a scalable template for adoption by other states and territories. [GOI]
Tokenized Deposits: Old Wine in New Bottles? (SUERF)
SUERF published a policy note by Alistair Milne that argues tokenized deposits offer little operational novelty over conventional account-based deposits, since the automation, programmability, and 24/7 processing attributed to distributed ledger technology are equally achievable on centralized ledgers. Decentralization’s only distinct capability is pseudonymous transfer without intermediaries—which banks are not pursuing. Tokenized deposits’ genuine appeal is confined to “on-us” transactions on a single bank’s balance sheet, avoiding interbank settlement complexity. JP Morgan’s Kinexys, adopted for corporate multi-currency cash management, exemplifies this, but reflects business logic rather than ledger technology. Milne characterizes bank tokenization efforts as a defensive marketing response to the stablecoin threat. Open questions include whether interoperability initiatives such as UK Finance’s tokenized sterling deposits project can generate domestic adoption incentives, and whether capital markets tokenization—requiring 100% reserving and settlement-asset recognition—warrants separate assessment. [SUERF]
BTW if you want to see a complete database of my DFC-related posts going back years, including many that didn’t make the Daily Digest cut, click here.
FYI I produce a monthly digest of digital fiat currency (DFC) developments exclusively for the official sector (e.g., central banks, ministries of finance and international financial institution (e.g., the BIS, IMF, OECD, World Bank)) plus academics and firms that are active in the DFC space (commercial banks, technology providers, consultants, etc.). (DFCs include central bank digital currency (CBDC), stablecoins and tokenized deposits.) It goes out via email on the first business day of every month, and if you’re interested in being on the mailing list, please email me at john@kiffmeister.com.
Kiffmeister’s #Fintech Daily Digest (20260806)
Bank of Korea Establishes Asset Tokenization Unit (Yonhap Infomax)
The Bank of Korea has reportedly established a dedicated asset tokenization unit under its Digital Currency Office as part of a regular mid‑year personnel reshuffle. The unit will lead efforts to tokenize assets, initially focusing on government bonds issued and distributed on a unified ledger integrating wholesale central bank digital currency (CBDC), bank deposits, and tokenized assets. This builds on “Project Hangang,” whose first real‑transaction phase ran from April to June 2025 and whose second phase will start in the second half of 2026 with more participating banks and enhanced functionality. The Korean government’s “2026 Second Half Economic Growth Strategy” also announces a government bond tokenization pilot linked to wholesale CBDC. [Yonhap Infomax]
Some backfilling of stablecoin stories I missed in June:
Open Standard Introduces Open USD Stablecoin (Open Standard)
[June 30, 2026] Open Standard announced Open USD, a consortium‑governed, zero‑fee stablecoin infrastructure for high‑volume, internet‑scale payments, responding to perceived economic and governance constraints in incumbent issuer models. The announcement highlights three pillars: free minting and redemption at any volume, pass‑through of reserve income to partner institutions net a small management fee, and governance via an independent company whose board is drawn from those partners. A large set of global banks, card networks, payment processors, technology platforms, and crypto firms have committed to integrate or support Open USD, positioning it as shared rails rather than proprietary product. The project’s significance lies in its attempt to reallocate stablecoin seigniorage and formalize multi‑firm governance, with unresolved issues around regulatory treatment, reserve composition, risk management, and actual decision‑making power distribution. [Open Standard]
Japan’s Three Largest Banks Aim for Joint Stablecoin Issue by March 2027 (Coin Desk)
[June 10, 2026] Japan’s three largest banking groups plan to issue a jointly branded yen stablecoin by March 2027, under a trust-bank structure backed by Japan’s Financial Services Agency and ruling party support for yen tokens. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group (MUFG), Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group (SMBC) and Mizuho Financial Group will form a council to design the operational framework, act as joint settlors, and appoint a trust bank or similar institution as trustee, indicating a balance-sheet-light, segregated-assets model aligned with Japan’s stablecoin law. This will create a regulated, large-scale yen stablecoin in a market currently dominated by U.S dollar tokens and where yen stablecoins remain below $50 million outstanding, with the leading token JPYC at around $18 million. Key unresolved issues are detailed operational design, legal treatment under evolving stablecoin rules, and how participation will extend beyond the initial three banks. [Coin Desk]
BTW if you want to see a complete database of my DFC-related posts going back years, including many that didn’t make the Daily Digest cut, click here.
FYI I produce a monthly digest of digital fiat currency (DFC) developments exclusively for the official sector (e.g., central banks, ministries of finance and international financial institution (e.g., the BIS, IMF, OECD, World Bank)) plus academics and firms that are active in the DFC space (commercial banks, technology providers, consultants, etc.). (DFCs include central bank digital currency (CBDC), stablecoins and tokenized deposits.) It goes out via email on the first business day of every month, and if you’re interested in being on the mailing list, please email me at john@kiffmeister.com.
Kiffmeister’s #Fintech Daily Digest (20260802)
China Cuts Durian Settlement to 30 Minutes with First Outbound e-CNY Payment to Malaysia (SCMP)
China has completed its first outbound payment via the Cross‑Border e‑CNY Express Service (CBETS) to Malaysia, settling a 43,000 yuan shipment of fresh durian. The transaction was executed by China Construction Bank’s Xiamen branch in coordination with its Labuan branch in Malaysia, using direct bank‑to‑bank ledger transfers and on‑the‑fly conversion into Malaysian ringgit. Compared with traditional correspondent banking networks operating under the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (SWIFT) system, this cut settlement to 30 minutes from one to three days and eliminated clearing fees of up to 6% and per‑transaction charges of $25 to $35. CBETS, operated by the e‑CNY International Operation Center under the guidance of the People’s Bank of China’s Digital Currency Institute, provides on‑chain and off‑chain connectivity and 24/7 cross‑border settlement. [SCMP]
FYI most publications are presenting this as a central bank digital currency (CBDC) story, but there’s no concrete evidence that it is. For starters, the Peoples Bank of China (PBOC) announced earlier in the year that the e-CNY is now a tokenized commercial bank deposit-based platform. And earlier stories going back to September 2025 (see below) that I missed make it clear that the Cross‑Border e‑CNY Express Service (CBETS) platform is only operating under PBOC guidance, so none of these platforms are CBDC-based according to the core part of the CBDC definition; a direct liability of the central bank.
26 Financial Institutions Sign On as direct participants with e-CNY Center International (SCIO)
[June 17, 2026] The State Council Information Office of China (SCIO) announced that the e‑CNY International Operation Center, which operates under the guidance of the Digital Currency Institute of the People’s Bank of China, has enrolled 26 institutions as direct participants on its Cross-Border e-CNY Transfer Services (CBETS) platform. Since the beginning of 2026, the e-CNY International Operations Center, which commenced operations in September 2025, has upgraded its three major platforms into the CBETS. CBETS provides on-chain and off-chain connectivity and 24/7 settlement, reducing reliance on three-to-five intermediary correspondent banks per transaction. The 26 aforementioned institutions include Standard Chartered China and Chinese bank branches in Thailand, Singapore, Laos, and Qatar. [SCIO]
e-CNY International Operation Center Officially Launched in Shanghai (PBOC)
[September 25, 2025] The People’s Bank of China (PBOC) formally launched the e‑CNY International Operation Center in Shanghai to provide dedicated infrastructure for cross‑border use of the digital renminbi, framed as part of a broader upgrade of monetary and payment systems. The center’s three core “business platforms” are a cross‑border digital payment platform, a blockchain service platform, and a digital asset platform, together supporting e‑CNY cross‑border settlement, asset tokenization, and related digital financial services. Institutionally, the PBOC’s Digital Currency Institute will build and operate these systems, with a mandate to connect domestic and foreign financial infrastructures and support international operation of e‑CNY. [PBOC]
BTW if you want to see a complete database of my DFC-related posts going back years, including many that didn’t make the Daily Digest cut, click here.
FYI I produce a monthly digest of digital fiat currency (DFC) developments exclusively for the official sector (e.g., central banks, ministries of finance and international financial institution (e.g., the BIS, IMF, OECD, World Bank)) plus academics and firms that are active in the DFC space (commercial banks, technology providers, consultants, etc.). (DFCs include central bank digital currency (CBDC), stablecoins and tokenized deposits.) It goes out via email on the first business day of every month, and if you’re interested in being on the mailing list, please email me at john@kiffmeister.com.
Protected: Kiffmeister’s Digital Currency Monitor, July 2026
Kiffmeister’s #Fintech Daily Digest (20260730)
Project Agorá Real Value Testing (BIS)
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) and Institute of International Finance (IIF) completed real value testing of their Project Agorá multi‑currency programmable platform for atomically settled wholesale cross‑border payments using wholesale central bank digital currency (CBDC) and tokenized commercial bank deposits. The trials involved 28 private-sector financial institutions and central banks executing approximately CHF 800,000 in transactions across 17 scenarios (corporate, interbank, intra-group, and payment‑versus‑payment) and six major currencies (CHF, EUR, GBP, JPY, KRW, USD) across Asia, Europe and North America, with end‑to‑end processing averaging 80 seconds from submission to settlement. The exercise focused on feasibility and operational performance under realistic conditions, highlighting improvements in speed, transparency, and status/routing visibility relative to existing correspondent banking architectures. However, still to be resolved are questions around legal treatment of tokenized claims, settlement finality, data‑sharing, and governance models. [BIS]
Are Stablecoins Efficient for Remittances? Evidence from a Mystery Shopping Exercise (Banca d’Italia)
Banca d’Italia published a paper that finds stablecoin-based remittances offer no systematic cost advantage over traditional channels, based on a mystery shopping exercise. Researchers transacting as ordinary customers transferred 200 USD Coin (USDC) across ten corridors linking Italy with Argentina, Brazil, South Africa, the UAE, and Japan. Total costs ranged from 0.30% to nearly 9%, with the on-chain transfer contributing a marginal 0.4%; the on- and off-ramp fiat-conversion steps, exchange fees, and funding method drove costs and duration. Speed depended on domestic payment infrastructure: instant-payment jurisdictions (Brazil’s PIX, Italy’s TIPS) settled end-to-end under 20 minutes, while standard bank transfers extended settlement to one or two days. Regulatory design shaped operator availability and feasibility. However, cross-corridor comparability is confounded by Argentina’s parallel exchange rates and single-stablecoin, and single-transaction scope limits generalization. [Banca d’Italia]
BTW if you want to see a complete database of my DFC-related posts going back years, including many that didn’t make the Daily Digest cut, click here.
FYI I produce a monthly digest of digital fiat currency (DFC) developments exclusively for the official sector (e.g., central banks, ministries of finance and international financial institution (e.g., the BIS, IMF, OECD, World Bank)) plus academics and firms that are active in the DFC space (commercial banks, technology providers, consultants, etc.). (DFCs include central bank digital currency (CBDC), stablecoins and tokenized deposits.) It goes out via email on the first business day of every month, and if you’re interested in being on the mailing list, please email me at john@kiffmeister.com.
Kiffmeister’s #Fintech Daily Digest (20260724)
Tokenisation of Money: From Fiat Currencies to Stablecoins has been officially published by Springer. This book brings together the expertise of more than 30 leading international authors from central banks, commercial banks, fintech companies, academia, technology providers, legal practice, and international organizations. Together, they provide diverse perspectives on the technological, economic, regulatory, legal, and operational dimensions of tokenized money. I contributed a chapter on retail central bank digital currency (CBDC) developments. [Springer]
Expansion of South Korean Deposit Token-Based Payment Infrastructure Project [KISA]
South Korea’s Internet & Security Agency (KISA) and its Ministry of Science and Information and Communication Technology (MSIT) have launched a 9.6 billion won project to operationalize wholesale central bank digital currency (CBDC)-based deposit tokens for retail and public-sector payments, extending the Bank of Korea’s Project Hangang pilot into commercial use. The scheme connects existing banking and payment rails to wholesale CBDC infrastructure, allowing nine banks, eight payment firms and selected merchants to support deposit token wallets and potentially cards without replacing point-of-sale hardware. Authorities frame this as a cost-reduction and transparency play for small merchants and government spending, with plans to link programmable deposit tokens to the dBrain public finance platform and business expense programs. Key unresolved issues include scaling compliance and fraud controls for commercialization and how deposit tokens will coexist with separately regulated won stablecoins. [KISA]
BTW if you want to see a complete database of my DFC-related posts going back years, including many that didn’t make the Daily Digest cut, click here.
FYI I produce a monthly digest of digital fiat currency (DFC) developments exclusively for the official sector (e.g., central banks, ministries of finance and international financial institution (e.g., the BIS, IMF, OECD, World Bank)) plus academics and firms that are active in the DFC space (commercial banks, technology providers, consultants, etc.). (DFCs include central bank digital currency (CBDC), stablecoins and tokenized deposits.) It goes out via email on the first business day of every month, and if you’re interested in being on the mailing list, please email me at john@kiffmeister.com.
Kiffmeister’s #Fintech Daily Digest (20260720)
Bank of Korea Accelerates Commercialization of Deposit Tokens (Yonhap News)
The Bank of Korea (BOK) is reportedly accelerating commercialization of deposit tokens under Phase 2 of Project Hangang, with real-transaction testing expected to resume as early as September 2026, as legislative progress on a won-denominated stablecoin has stalled. Phase 1 (April–June 2025) enrolled 81,000 participants and recorded 114,880 transactions; Phase 2 expands participating banks from seven to nine, adds peer-to-peer transfers, biometric authentication, and broader merchant coverage. A government pilot will test purpose-bound deposit tokens for electric vehicle charging subsidies to prevent fraudulent disbursements. A separate Ministry of Finance and Economy initiative will pilot government bond tokenization linked to the BOK’s institutional central bank digital currency next year. Passage of enabling Digital Assets Act legislation remains unresolved. [Yonhap News]
BTW if you want to see a complete database of my DFC-related posts going back years, including many that didn’t make the Daily Digest cut, click here.
FYI I produce a monthly digest of digital fiat currency (DFC) developments exclusively for the official sector (e.g., central banks, ministries of finance and international financial institution (e.g., the BIS, IMF, OECD, World Bank)) plus academics and firms that are active in the DFC space (commercial banks, technology providers, consultants, etc.). (DFCs include central bank digital currency (CBDC), stablecoins and tokenized deposits.) It goes out via email on the first business day of every month, and if you’re interested in being on the mailing list, please email me at john@kiffmeister.com.
Kiffmeister’s #Fintech Daily Digest (20260707)
The Shift in China’s CBDC (Digital Yuan) Policy and Key Implications (JRI)
Japan Research Institute (JRI) published a paper that analyzes China’s decision in late 2025 to shift the digital yuan (e‑CNY) from a non‑interest‑bearing central bank digital currency (CBDC) to an interest‑bearing commercial bank liability integrated into reserve requirements and deposit insurance (i.e., functionally a tokenized deposit). It argues this redesign aims to align bank balance‑sheet incentives, move usage toward corporate and cross‑border payments, and better plug into the mBridge cross‑border infrastructure as part of a strategy to deepen renminbi‑denominated settlement outside the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (SWIFT) system. Unresolved issues include whether this deposit‑based model can achieve scale amid entrenched super‑app payments, opaque mBridge usage, and continued constraints on non‑official digital currencies in China. [JRI]
Blockchain Consensus Mechanisms and Fragmentation (BIS)
The BIS published a paper by Eidan, Frost, Kansal, Lewrick, Lim and Rybarczyk that argues permissionless blockchains are structurally driven toward fragmented, specialized infrastructures rather than a unified financial market infrastructure, in the context of rising crypto and stablecoin use. The paper links heterogenous consensus mechanisms and token incentive structures to distinct equilibria across layer 1 and layer 2 networks, which fragment liquidity horizontally and vertically. It shows that mitigation tools—bridges, native multi‑chain issuance, shared middleware and interoperability protocols—reduce frictions but recreate concentrated trust, governance and operational nodes. A key unresolved issue is how to design standards and regulatory perimeters that reduce fragmentation while preserving competition and cross‑border interoperability. [BIS]
A Money View of Offline Payment Functionality (SSRN)
G+D’s Lars Hupel has updated his “money view” offline payments paper, arguing that offline-capable retail payment systems should use a single issuer, not multiple bank issuers, in the context of CBDC and fast payment system design. The paper compares central bank CBDC, a multi-issuer commercial bank token model, and a single-issuer model for offline value transfer; it finds that multi-issuer offline tokens create foreign-liability, fungibility, and counterparty-risk problems, while a single-issuer structure more closely preserves cash-like bearer behavior. The policy significance is that offline functionality can be built without a central bank-issued instrument, but only if issuance, prefunding, settlement access, and anti-money-laundering controls are centralized enough to preserve finality and risk management. [SSRN]
BTW if you want to see a complete database of my DFC-related posts going back years, including many that didn’t make the Daily Digest cut, click here.
FYI I produce a monthly digest of digital fiat currency (DFC) developments exclusively for the official sector (e.g., central banks, ministries of finance and international financial institution (e.g., the BIS, IMF, OECD, World Bank)) plus academics and firms that are active in the DFC space (commercial banks, technology providers, consultants, etc.). (DFCs include central bank digital currency (CBDC), stablecoins and tokenized deposits.) It goes out via email on the first business day of every month, and if you’re interested in being on the mailing list, please email me at john@kiffmeister.com.