Kiffmeister’s #Fintech Daily Digest (02/28/2022)*

I’ve updated my tabulation of retail central bank digital currency (CBDC) explorers to include Uganda and update a few links.

Cecchetti and Schoenholtz Comments on Fed CBDC Paper

Steve Cecchetti and Kermit Schoenholtz responded to the 22 questions posed in the Fed’s central bank digital currency (CBDC) discussion paper. In general, they doubt that the benefits of a U.S. CBDC will exceed the risks, and that other, less risky, means are available to achieve all the key benefits that CBDC advocates anticipate. But if the Fed were to go ahead, they suggest that there should be no cap on individual holdings, to avoid a premium on CBDC (compared to other central bank liabilities) that would just redirect runs into close substitutes (such as Treasury bills).

Also, the Fed should expect to pay interest on CBDC because it would be politically unsustainable for the Fed to pay interest on wholesale digital liabilities without paying interest on retail digital liabilities. Also, not paying interest on CBDC would diminish its attractiveness relative to other safe, liquid instruments. Plus, that interest will be in part a mechanism to compensate the private intermediaries for performing the necessary services of creating and maintaining accounts, verifying identities, tracking assets, implementing transactions, and monitoring for suspicious activity.

They acknowledge that these would increase run risk in the private financial system, but in their view all of the benefits expected from issuing CBDCs can be achieved less disruptively, and they provide alternative mechanisms for five widely claimed benefits. They see two potential developments that could make a U.S. CBDC worthwhile; (i) if regulation of stablecoins prove politically infeasible (see their earlier post), or (ii) if other highly trustworthy financial jurisdictions (with convertible currencies, credible property rights protections, and free cross-border flow of capital) offer their own CBDC.

If the Fed does go ahead an issue CBDC, offline capability would add to its attractiveness. When the internet is not available, mobile telephony could provide a backup, and to facilitate everyday payments, small transactions also should be feasible offline, via Bluetooth or NFC links. [Read more]

Central Bank of Trinidad and Tobago to make decision on CBDC pilot by mid-year

The Central Bank of Trinidad and Tobago reportedly hopes to make a decision on a possible CBDC pilot by mid-year. The central bank’s  focus is on improving the payments system by promoting more widespread, safe and efficient electronic financial transactions. It is receiving IMF technical assistance, including on technical aspects and country experiences. [Read more]

Tracing the footprint of cryptoization in emerging market economies

This Bank for International Settlements (BIS) note provides estimates of the extent of “cryptoization” in emerging market economies (EMEs). In countries with volatile and/or depreciating exchange rates, holders of domestic fiat currencies have incentives to shift into reserve currency-pegged stablecoins, which conveniently help avoid capital controls and financial integrity requirements. The BIS note found that trading of US dollar-linked stablecoins vis-à-vis some EME currencies has soared since 2020, particularly against the Turkish lira and the Brazilian real. In addition, trading of risky crypto-assets, such as Bitcoin, also spiked in some EMEs facing depreciation pressure. [Read more]

The emerging autonomy-stability choice for stablecoins

This paper by Maarten van Oordt illustrates how fiat-backed/pegged stablecoin peg deviations may occur when the issuer doesn’t have reliable access to the traditional payment system of the jurisdiction that issues the relevant fiat currency. It suggests that national authorities could make stablecoin issuer access to payment systems conditional on submitting to regulatory controls. Stablecoin users would then face a choice between regulated stablecoins with a stable value but little autonomy, and alternative stablecoin arrangements with more autonomy but a less stable value. [Read more]

Jurisdictions Where Retail CBDC Is Being Explored (as of March 6, 2022)

John Kiff Normal John Kiff 2 1 2022-03-06T17:18:00Z 2022-03-06T17:18:00Z 2 2917 16631 IMF 138 39 19509 16.00 True 8085fa43-302e-45bd-b171-a6648c3b6be7 JKiff@imf.org 2020-10-09T20:09:06.8654127Z FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Microsoft Azure Information Protection Automatic FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Clean Clean false false false false EN-US ZH-TW AR-SA /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:”Table Normal”; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-parent:””; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin-top:0in; mso-para-margin-right:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:8.0pt; mso-para-margin-left:0in; line-height:107%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:”Arial”,sans-serif; mso-ascii-font-family:Arial; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:Arial; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:Arial; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;} table.MsoTableGrid {mso-style-name:”Table Grid”; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-priority:39; mso-style-unhide:no; border:solid windowtext 1.0pt; mso-border-alt:solid windowtext .5pt; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-border-insideh:.5pt solid windowtext; mso-border-insidev:.5pt solid windowtext; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:”Arial”,sans-serif; mso-ascii-font-family:Arial; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:Arial; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:Arial; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;} table.TableGrid3 {mso-style-name:”Table Grid3″; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-priority:39; mso-style-unhide:no; border:solid windowtext 1.0pt; mso-border-alt:solid windowtext .5pt; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-border-insideh:.5pt solid windowtext; mso-border-insidev:.5pt solid windowtext; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:”Arial”,sans-serif; mso-ascii-font-family:Arial; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:SimSun; mso-hansi-font-family:Arial; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:Arial; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;}

Jurisdictions Where Retail CBDC Is Being Explored (as of March 6, 2022)

Where central banks (CBs) have launched or piloted (or soon will)

Bahamas (launched)

Nigeria (pilot launched)

China (pilot launched)

Russia (pilot launched)

Eastern Caribbean (pilot launched)

Uruguay (pilot completed)

Jamaica (pilot completed; launch imminent)

 

Where CBs have done proofs of concepts (or soon will)

Bahrain (completed 2022)

Korea

Bhutan (planned)

New Zealand

Euro Area

Sweden

Japan (started)

Thailand

Ghana (started)

Turkey

Hungary (completed 2021)

Ukraine (completed 2019)

Iran (completed 2022)

United States (2022)

Kazakhstan (completed 2021)

 

Where CBs are in advanced stages of research and development

Canada (update)

Norway

Mauritius (update)

United Kingdom

Where CBs have explored or are exploring (with year of last update)

Australia (2021)

Morocco (2019)(update; 2022)

Brazil (2021)(update, 2021)

Nepal (2021)(update; 2022)

Chile (2021)

Oman (2022)

Curaçao en Sint Maarten (2018)

Pakistan (2021)

Czech Republic (2021)

Palestine (2021)(update; 2022)

Denmark (2017)

Peru (2019)(update; 2021)

Egypt (2022)

Philippines (2022)

Eswatini (2020)

Poland (2021)

Georgia (2021)(update; 2021)

Qatar (2022)

Haiti (Bitkòb)(2021)

Singapore (2021)(update, 2022)

Honduras (2021)

Saudi Arabia (2022)

Hong Kong SAR (2021)

South Africa (2021)

Iceland (2018)

Sudan (2022)

India (2021)(update; 2022)

Switzerland (2019)

Indonesia (2020)(update; 2021)

Taiwan (2020)(update; 2022)

Iraq (2022)

Trinidad & Tobago (2021)(update; 2022)

Israel (2021)(update; 2022)

Tunisia (2018)(update; 2022)

Kenya (2022)

Uganda (2022)

Lebanon (2020)(update; 2022)

Viet Nam (2021)

Kuwait (2019)(update; 2022)

Yemen (2022)

Madagascar (2021)

Zimbabwe (2022)

Malaysia (2021)

 

Where CBs have explored or are exploring (according to reputable sources)

Guatemala (2021)

Rwanda (2022)

Jordan (2022)

Tanzania (2021)

Laos (2021)

United Arab Emirates (2021)

Macau (2021)

Zambia (2022)

Mexico (2022)

 

Where CBs have launched and discontinued

Ecuador (2014-2018)(CBDC?)

Finland (1992-2006)

Sources: Central banks or various news sources per hyperlinks above, the Bank for International Settlements CBDC database and CBDCTracker.org.

Note: Retail CBDC is a broadly available general purpose digital payment instrument, denominated in the jurisdiction’s unit of account, that is a direct liability of the jurisdiction’s monetary authority. This table does not cover wholesale CBDC, which is limited to a set of predefined user groups, typically financial institutions.

Recent papers that focus on the practical aspects of CBDC issuance:

Kiff, J., J. Alwazir, S. Davidovic, A. Farias, A. Khan, T. Khiaonarong, M. Malaika, H.K. Monroe, N. Sugimoto, H. Tourpe, and P. Zhou. 2020. “A Survey of Research on Retail Central Bank Digital Currency,” IMF Working Paper No. 20/104.

Adrian, T., and T. Mancini-Griffoli. 2019a. “The Rise of Digital Money,” IMF Fintech Note 19/01.

Auer, R., J. Frost, L. Gambacorta, C. Monnet, T. Rice and H.S. Shin. 2021. “Central Bank Digital Currencies: Motives, Economic Implications and the Research Frontier,” Bank for International Settlements Working Paper No. 976, November.

Auer, R. and R. Boehme. 2021. “Central Bank Digital Currency: The Quest for Minimally Invasive Technology,” Bank for International Settlements Working Paper No. 948, June.

Bank for International Settlements. 2020. “Central Bank Digital Currencies: Foundational Principles and Core Features,” October.

Bank of England. 2020. “Central Bank Digital Currency: Opportunities, Challenges and Design,” Discussion Paper, March.

Bindseil, U. 2020. “Tiered CBDC and the Financial System,” European Central Bank Working Paper No. 2351, January.

Bossu, W., M. Itatani, C. Margulis, A. Rossi, H. Weenink and A. Yoshinaga. 2020. “Legal Aspects of Central Bank Digital Currency: Central Bank and Monetary Law Considerations,” IMF Working Paper No. 20/254.

Brookings Institution. 2020. "Design Choices for Central Bank Digital Currency: Policy and Technical Considerations," Global Economy & Development Working Paper 140, July.

European Central Bank. 2020. “Report on a Digital Euro,” October.

Niepelt, D. (ed.). 2021. Central Bank Digital Currency: Considerations, Projects and Outlook, Centre for Economic Policy Research, November.

Shah, D., R. Arora, H. Du, S. Darbha, J. Miedema, and C. Minwalla. 2020. “Technology Approach for a CBDC,” Bank of Canada Staff Analytical Note 2020-6.

Soderberg, Bechara, Bossu, Che, Davidovic, Kiff, Lukonga, Mancini-Griffoli, Sun and Yoshinaga. 2020. "Behind the Scenes of Central Bank Digital Currency," IMF FinTech Note No 2022/004.

Sveriges Riksbank. 2020. Economic Review: Second Special Issue on the E-Krona.

World Bank. 2021. “Central Bank Digital Currency: A Payments Perspective.”

World Economic Forum. 2020. Central Bank Digital Currency Policy-Maker Toolkit. And the WEF’s Ashley Lannquist maintains the ultimate CBDC reading list here!