Project Agorá Real Value Testing (BIS)
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) and Institute of International Finance (IIF) completed real value testing of their Project Agorá multi‑currency programmable platform for atomically settled wholesale cross‑border payments using wholesale central bank digital currency (CBDC) and tokenized commercial bank deposits. The trials involved 28 private-sector financial institutions and central banks executing approximately CHF 800,000 in transactions across 17 scenarios (corporate, interbank, intra-group, and payment‑versus‑payment) and six major currencies (CHF, EUR, GBP, JPY, KRW, USD) across Asia, Europe and North America, with end‑to‑end processing averaging 80 seconds from submission to settlement. The exercise focused on feasibility and operational performance under realistic conditions, highlighting improvements in speed, transparency, and status/routing visibility relative to existing correspondent banking architectures. However, still to be resolved are questions around legal treatment of tokenized claims, settlement finality, data‑sharing, and governance models. [BIS]
Are Stablecoins Efficient for Remittances? Evidence from a Mystery Shopping Exercise (Banca d’Italia)
Banca d’Italia published a paper that finds stablecoin-based remittances offer no systematic cost advantage over traditional channels, based on a mystery shopping exercise. Researchers transacting as ordinary customers transferred 200 USD Coin (USDC) across ten corridors linking Italy with Argentina, Brazil, South Africa, the UAE, and Japan. Total costs ranged from 0.30% to nearly 9%, with the on-chain transfer contributing a marginal 0.4%; the on- and off-ramp fiat-conversion steps, exchange fees, and funding method drove costs and duration. Speed depended on domestic payment infrastructure: instant-payment jurisdictions (Brazil’s PIX, Italy’s TIPS) settled end-to-end under 20 minutes, while standard bank transfers extended settlement to one or two days. Regulatory design shaped operator availability and feasibility. However, cross-corridor comparability is confounded by Argentina’s parallel exchange rates and single-stablecoin, and single-transaction scope limits generalization. [Banca d’Italia]
BTW if you want to see a complete database of my DFC-related posts going back years, including many that didn’t make the Daily Digest cut, click here.
FYI I produce a monthly digest of digital fiat currency (DFC) developments exclusively for the official sector (e.g., central banks, ministries of finance and international financial institution (e.g., the BIS, IMF, OECD, World Bank)) plus academics and firms that are active in the DFC space (commercial banks, technology providers, consultants, etc.). (DFCs include central bank digital currency (CBDC), stablecoins and tokenized deposits.) It goes out via email on the first business day of every month, and if you’re interested in being on the mailing list, please email me at john@kiffmeister.com.
