The Multi-Issuance Issue (SSRN)
A paper posted by Ulrich Bindseil and others critically examines the viability under European Union (EU) Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulations, of stablecoin arrangements in which entities inside and outside the EU issue and redeem a single fungible stablecoin, each backing only the tokens it has itself issued. The authors use a financial accounts framework covering the two issuing entities, their custodian banks, holders, and an arbitrageur, to argue that token fungibility could inadvertently concentrate redemption pressure on EU-based issuers during stress events, potentially depleting local reserves. Furthermore, they question the efficacy of localized reserve mandates, positing that such requirements are either redundant if foreign frameworks are robust, or structurally flawed if they force dollar-denominated tokens into inferior offshore accounts. Ultimately, the paper advocates for an equivalence regime that allows direct EU distribution of foreign-issued stablecoins, despite reliance on foreign regulatory parity not completely safeguarding the EU against cross-border contagion. [SSRN]
eCurrency Unveils Secure eOffline CBDC (PR Newswire)
eCurrency Mint announced its Secure eOffline central bank digital currency (CBDC) solution, demonstrated in Africa, enabling consumers, merchants, and government agencies to transact CBDC without internet or mobile connectivity via partner-supplied phones, smart cards, or dedicated hardware. It positions offline capability as parity with cash and a lever for financial inclusion within eCurrency’s existing Digital Symmetric Core Currency Cryptography (DSC3) infrastructure. However, the release provides no technical detail on offline settlement finality, double-spend prevention, or reconciliation upon reconnection. [PR Newswire]
Central Banks On-Chain (ECB)
Discussing Darrell Duffie’s “Tokenized Finance and the Perimeter of Central Banking” paper at the 2026 Jackson Hole Conference, European Central Bank (ECB) Executive Board Member Isabel Schnabel argued that wholesale tokenization requires an ultimate settlement asset that is both risk-free and elastically supplied. Challenging Duffie’s perimeter conservatism, she maintained that stablecoins cannot replicate central bank liquidity provision under systemic stress, and that proxy or bridge models preserve fragmentation while leaving policy operations off-chain. Citing the need to defend European monetary sovereignty against the rise of foreign-currency stablecoins, she advocated for native tokenized central bank reserves to enable atomic repo, automated collateral management, and 24/7 liquidity facilities. Schnabel framed the central design choice as a trade-off between common ledgers—which maximize atomicity and integration—and interoperable networks, which better mitigate concentration, governance, operational resilience, and technology lock-in risks. [ECB]
BTW if you want to see a complete database of my DFC-related posts going back years, including many that didn’t make the Daily Digest cut, click here.
FYI I produce a monthly digest of digital fiat currency (DFC) developments exclusively for the official sector (e.g., central banks, ministries of finance and international financial institution (e.g., the BIS, IMF, OECD, World Bank)) plus academics and firms that are active in the DFC space (commercial banks, technology providers, consultants, etc.). (DFCs include central bank digital currency (CBDC), stablecoins and tokenized deposits.) It goes out via email on the first business day of every month, and if you’re interested in being on the mailing list, please email me at john@kiffmeister.com.
